1998
DOI: 10.1021/ef980084l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reduced Kinetic Model for NOx Reduction by Advanced Reburning

Abstract: Advanced reburning technology, which makes use of natural gas injection followed by ammonia injection, has proven to be an effective method for the removal of up to 85-95% of the NO in pulverized, coal-fired furnaces. This paper reports the development of a seven-step, 11-species reduced mechanism for the prediction of nitric oxide concentrations using advanced reburning from a 312-step, 50-species full mechanism. The derivation of the reduced mechanism is described, including the selection of the full mechani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comprehensive modeling of the CPR for comparison with the measured data has been attempted using PCGC-3, a comprehensive pulverized coal combustion model developed at Brigham Young University by the Advanced Combustion Engineering Research Center (ACERC). The code has recently be upgraded to include subroutines for reburning and advanced reburning as described by Xu and Smoot (1998) and Xu and Smoot (1999). Additionally, a commercial combustion code, FLUENT, has been used for comparison with the flow exiting the primary reaction zone.…”
Section: Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive modeling of the CPR for comparison with the measured data has been attempted using PCGC-3, a comprehensive pulverized coal combustion model developed at Brigham Young University by the Advanced Combustion Engineering Research Center (ACERC). The code has recently be upgraded to include subroutines for reburning and advanced reburning as described by Xu and Smoot (1998) and Xu and Smoot (1999). Additionally, a commercial combustion code, FLUENT, has been used for comparison with the flow exiting the primary reaction zone.…”
Section: Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For minor species, such as OH, H and CH 4 , errors are a little larger though profile agreements are still preserved. Predicted profiles of other involved species represent similar features even if not shown in figure. Comparatively scalar errors are a little larger in C 3 H 8 /air case than those in H 2 /air case due to inclusion of kinetics reduction process, but by referring to the errors resulting from traditional reduced mechanism [9,[28][29][30][31], the error magnitude is quite acceptable. Overall, the ANN-based method for chemical kinetics reduction can well replicate the flame dynamics in FVI at the influence of different vortex.…”
Section: Fvi Testmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…are air staging, 8,9 temperature adjustment, 10 selective noncatalytic reduction (SNCR), 11 lowering excess air, 12 reburning (fuel staging), 13,14 flue gas recirculation, 15 and fuel blending. 16,17 Hybrid systems such as SNCR, air staging, 11 and reburning combined with SNCR (advanced reburning) 18,19 have also been investigated. In comparison, countermeasures against bed agglomeration include the use of alternative bed materials, 7,20,21 additives, 22,23 cocombustion, 7,24 and biomass pretreatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%