2010
DOI: 10.1137/090754595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Redistributed Proximal Bundle Method for Nonconvex Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
108
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not long after works on bundle methods for the convex case were first developed, the problem of (locally) minimizing a nonsmooth nonconvex function using exact information was considered in [20,36] and more recently in [1,18,23,31,37]. Many of these bundle methods were developed from a "dual" point of view.…”
Section: Example 3 (Stochastic Simulations)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Not long after works on bundle methods for the convex case were first developed, the problem of (locally) minimizing a nonsmooth nonconvex function using exact information was considered in [20,36] and more recently in [1,18,23,31,37]. Many of these bundle methods were developed from a "dual" point of view.…”
Section: Example 3 (Stochastic Simulations)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, they focus on driving certain convex combinations of subgradients towards satisfaction of first order optimality conditions [27,28,30,[34][35][36]. Except for [18], all of these methods handle nonconvexity by downshitfing the so-called linearization errors if they are negative. The method of [18] tilts the slopes in addition to downshifting.…”
Section: Example 3 (Stochastic Simulations)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This feature is particularly important for nonconvex bundle methods, which need to handle very carefully cutting-planes models (in some cases a tangent line of a nonconvex function can cut-off a section of the graph of the function, leaving out a critical point, for example), [HS10].…”
Section: Outer Function and Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%