2022
DOI: 10.1130/g49613.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A red bole zircon record of cryptic silicic volcanism in the Deccan Traps, India

Abstract: Silicic magmas within large igneous provinces (LIPs) are understudied relative to volumetrically dominant mafic magmas despite their prevalence and possible contribution to LIP-induced environmental degradation. In the 66 Ma Deccan LIP (India), evolved magmatism is documented, but its geographic distribution, duration, and significance remain poorly understood. Zircons deposited in weathered Deccan lava flow tops (“red boles”) offer a means of indirectly studying potentially widespread, silicic, explosive volc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correction for the decay of 176 Lu into 176 Hf after zircon crystallization is done by combining TIMS high-precision U–Pb crystallization ages and measured Lu/Hf ratios. TIMS U–Pb dating was done at Princeton University using established procedures. , The U–Pb age was calculated for each leachate and trace elements (including Lu/Hf ratio) were analyzed on an aliquot of each solution using a Thermo iCAP single collector quadrupole ICP-MS following the methodology in O’Connor et al Measurements were calibrated using a matrix-matched external calibration solution with Lu, Hf, and other trace elements proportional to those in natural zircon. Instrument drift and data reproducibility were monitored by the measurement of four independent standard solutions: MUNZirc 1–2c, MUNZirc 3–2c, Plesovice, , and an in-house Zr–Hf standard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correction for the decay of 176 Lu into 176 Hf after zircon crystallization is done by combining TIMS high-precision U–Pb crystallization ages and measured Lu/Hf ratios. TIMS U–Pb dating was done at Princeton University using established procedures. , The U–Pb age was calculated for each leachate and trace elements (including Lu/Hf ratio) were analyzed on an aliquot of each solution using a Thermo iCAP single collector quadrupole ICP-MS following the methodology in O’Connor et al Measurements were calibrated using a matrix-matched external calibration solution with Lu, Hf, and other trace elements proportional to those in natural zircon. Instrument drift and data reproducibility were monitored by the measurement of four independent standard solutions: MUNZirc 1–2c, MUNZirc 3–2c, Plesovice, , and an in-house Zr–Hf standard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trace element analyses (TEA) ( 88 ) were performed at Princeton University with methods similar to those applied in O’Connor et al ( 89 ), reproduced here with minimal adjustments. All results are available in data S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for ID-TIMS U-Pb geochronology, minerals are dissolved and U and Pb are isolated from other elements using ion exchange chemistry. Now it is becoming more common to measure the chemical (e.g., rare earth element) or isotopic (e.g., Hf, Sr, and Nd) composition of other elements in the sample by ICP-MS to add another layer of information to help with U-Pb date interpretation (Amelin et al, 1999;O'Connor et al, 2022;Schaltegger et al, 2002;Schoene et al, 2010b). Each of these tools can be used to both formulate and evaluate hypotheses regarding progressive growth of dated minerals and can even be used to argue in favor of protracted crystal growth or Pb-loss as the viable mechanism for creating age dispersion in a sample (Schoene and Baxter, 2017; Schoene Szymanowski et al, 2017;Wotzlaw et al, 2013).…”
Section: Analytical Tools For Understanding Age Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%