1995
DOI: 10.1109/24.475978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A recursive variance-reduction algorithm for estimating communication-network reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second MC method is the RVR which associates every output random variable with a variance, and limits the results in order to obtain a greater precision. Therefore RVR will give a more accurate DCR estimation than the CMC method when using the same number of random samples [4]. However as we will show in the next sections, the CMC approach will yield excellent results when parallelism is applied.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Techniques To Evaluate the Dcrmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second MC method is the RVR which associates every output random variable with a variance, and limits the results in order to obtain a greater precision. Therefore RVR will give a more accurate DCR estimation than the CMC method when using the same number of random samples [4]. However as we will show in the next sections, the CMC approach will yield excellent results when parallelism is applied.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Techniques To Evaluate the Dcrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Section 2 we will give a background for an exact method (Factoring Theorem) of evaluation and MC techniques to estimate the DCR [4,8]. In Section 3 we present the pseudo-code of our implementation using MPI parallel processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been originally proposed by Héctor Cancela and Mohammed El Khadiri for the classical network reliability model [5]. The key idea is to find a cutset C = {e 1 , .…”
Section: Recursive Variance Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons to choose IS and RVR is that they present high performance under highly robust scenarios. The first method, RVR, received a distinction (i.e., a paper award) for its originally concept of network reliability [5]. On the other hand, the main concept of IS is to modify the probabilities, in such a way that the probability of rare events is increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems that can Several papers have been devoted to its évaluation when nodes do not limit flow transmission and when arcs capacities are discrete, multi-valued and statistically independent random variables [1,7,11,15,16]. When all arcs have only two possible capacities 1 or 0 and the demand is d = 1, the problem becomes the source-terminal reliability problem [3,6,10] which is NP-hard [2], Consequently, the gênerai case considered here is also an NPhard problem. This implies that the computational time will be prohibitive when the network size is large [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%