2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14556-8_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Recursive Approach to Entity Ranking and List Completion Using Entity Determining Terms, Qualifiers and Prominent n-Grams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of them (Balog, Bron, and de Rijke 2010; 2011; Kaptein and Kamps 2013) model category matching using generative language models. Solutions (Balog et al 2009a;Ramanathan et al 2009) achieving top results in INEX 2009 entity track (Demartini, Iofciu, and de Vries 2009) all treat category matching as an important component in their ranking functions. In particular, a linear combination of term-based model and category-based model is proposed in (Balog et al 2009a;Balog, Bron, and de Rijke 2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many of them (Balog, Bron, and de Rijke 2010; 2011; Kaptein and Kamps 2013) model category matching using generative language models. Solutions (Balog et al 2009a;Ramanathan et al 2009) achieving top results in INEX 2009 entity track (Demartini, Iofciu, and de Vries 2009) all treat category matching as an important component in their ranking functions. In particular, a linear combination of term-based model and category-based model is proposed in (Balog et al 2009a;Balog, Bron, and de Rijke 2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A category (either in C or C e ) is assumed as a phrase specifying a type of entities. It can be further interpreted as a head word plus some additional qualifiers (Ramanathan et al 2009). The head word typically specifies a general category, and the qualifiers restrict the general category so that it can be more specific.…”
Section: Category Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One approach used the relevance assessments available from prior years, promoting documents previously assessed as relevant, achieving xin-fAP scores up to 0.517 (Balog et al, 2010b). Ramanathan et al (2010) combine a number of expansion and matching techniques based on the page titles, categories and extracted entities and n-grams. An initial set of relevant documents is recursively expanded using the document titles, category information, proximity information and the prominent n-grams.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%