2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A recurrent cross-sectional qualitative study exploring how low-income mothers define snacks and reasons for offering snacks during infancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of 20 participants is a suitable number for explorative qualitative research and used in many previous studies (e.g. Berner-Rodorede et al, 2021;Gram et al, 2017;Jacquier et al, 2017;Moore et al, 2021;Tang et al, 2020). Selected snack bars containing chocolate and nuts were presented as a stimulus product to the adolescents and their properties for healthiness, naturalness and sustainability were discussed.…”
Section: Methods 21 Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of 20 participants is a suitable number for explorative qualitative research and used in many previous studies (e.g. Berner-Rodorede et al, 2021;Gram et al, 2017;Jacquier et al, 2017;Moore et al, 2021;Tang et al, 2020). Selected snack bars containing chocolate and nuts were presented as a stimulus product to the adolescents and their properties for healthiness, naturalness and sustainability were discussed.…”
Section: Methods 21 Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have found that caregivers also differ widely in their definitions of what constitutes a “snack”, which typically incorporates certain types of food, provided in smaller portions and between meals [ 23 , 24 ]. Another study with caregivers of infants (6 months) identified a common belief that snacks are sweet [ 25 ]. One qualitative study with Dutch parents found numerous value conflicts in parents’ decisions about what snacks to serve their children (2–7 years), including healthfulness versus convenience, judgments by other parents, saying “no” to child requests and less nutritious snacks provided by others [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%