A Recovery Technique for the Fog-Computing-Based Information and Control Systems

Melnik, E. V.; Klimenko, Anna; Klimenko, V. V.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00184-1_20

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…• Subjected to uncertain failures: Fog nodes are highly prone to get affected by anomalies such as power failures and out of capacity faults that obstruct the execution of applications assigned to them [Melnik et al 2019]. Due to latency issues, the recovery of applications also becomes difficult.…”

Section: Challenges Of Application Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, to deal with the scarcity of resources, they have not provided any concrete model that can dynamically tune the frequency of check points within an application and change the number of replications in Fog environments. Replication [Fiandrino et al 2019] Encryption [Filiposka et al 2019] Migration [Fizza et al 2018] Threshold Reservation [Giang et al 2019] Threshold Migration [He et al 2018] Incentives Replication [Huang and Xu 2016] Reservation [JoÅąilo and DÃąn 2019] Incentives [Kayal and Liebeherr 2019] Threshold Threshold [Kim and Chung 2018] Compensation Threshold [Li et al 2019b] Incentives [Li et al 2018b] Threshold ] Implication [Luo et al 2019] Authentication Threshold [Mahmud et al 2018c] Migration Compensation [Melnik et al 2019] Backup-Restore [Mohamed et al 2019] Backup-Restore [Mouradian et al 2019] Threshold [Nair and Somasundaram 2019] Implication Migration [Noura et al 2019] Encryption Backup-Restore [Oma et al 2019] Backup-Restore, Replication [Ozeer et al 2018] Threshold Backup-Restore [Prabavathy et al 2019] Implication, Threshold [Puliafito et al 2018] Migration Integrity, Authentication [Saurez et al 2016] Integrity Migration [Su et al 2018] Encryption Replication [Tuli et al 2019] Integrity [Tychalas and Karatza 2020] Threshold [Verba et al 2019] Migration [Vinueza Naranjo et al 2018] Authentication [Wang et al 2019a] Implication Migration Threshold Replication Authentication [Wazid et al 2019] Authentication Authentication Migration [Yu et al 2017] Compensation Replication Incentives [Battula et al 2019] Compensation [Zhao et al 2019] Migration Incentives Migration…”

Section: Research Gaps In Application Maintenancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Application Management in Fog Computing Environments: A Taxonomy, Review and Future Directions

Mahmud,

Ramamohanarao,

Buyya

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm is being rapidly adopted for the creation of smart environments in various domains. The IoT-enabled Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) associated with smart city, healthcare, Industry 4.0 and Agtech handle a huge volume of data and require data processing services from different types of applications in real-time. The Cloud-centric execution of IoT applications barely meets such requirements as the Cloud datacentres reside at a multi-hop distance from the IoT devices. Fog computing, an extension of Cloud at the edge network, can execute these applications closer to data sources. Thus, Fog computing can improve application service delivery time and resist network congestion. However, the Fog nodes are highly distributed, heterogeneous and most of them are constrained in resources and spatial sharing. Therefore, efficient management of applications is necessary to fully exploit the capabilities of Fog nodes. In this work, we investigate the existing application management strategies in Fog computing and review them in terms of architecture, placement and maintenance. Additionally, we propose a comprehensive taxonomy and highlight the research gaps in Fog-based application management. We also discuss a perspective model and provide future research directions for further improvement of application management in Fog computing. CCS Concepts: • General and reference → General literature; • Computer systems organization → Distributed architectures.

show abstract

Section: Challenges Of Application Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%