2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4922249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reconfigurable gate architecture for Si/SiGe quantum dots

Abstract: We demonstrate a reconfigurable quantum dot gate architecture that incorporates two interchangeable transport channels. One channel is used to form quantum dots and the other is used for charge sensing. The quantum dot transport channel can support either a single or a double quantum dot. We demonstrate few-electron occupation in a single quantum dot and extract charging energies as large as 6.6 meV. Magnetospectroscopy is used to measure valley splittings in the range of 35-70 µeV. By energizing two additiona… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

8
171
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
171
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The device used here and in all subsequent figures differs from the device used in Fig. 2 by the addition of a screening gate [30] and the use of enriched 28 Si (800 ppm 29 Si) [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The device used here and in all subsequent figures differs from the device used in Fig. 2 by the addition of a screening gate [30] and the use of enriched 28 Si (800 ppm 29 Si) [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some devices in our study differ from Ref. [13] by the addition of a metal screening gate which prevents charge accumulation under gate leads [30]. A proximal dot charge sensor formed by the M and Z gates enables single-shot readout of the qubit state [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Device designs, dot operation, and qubit manipulation have all been reported using this enhancement-mode architecture [7][8][9][10] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dots have average charging energies E c ¼ 6.9 6 0.7 meV, average orbital energies E orb ¼ 3.0 6 0.5 meV, and valley splittings in the range of 35-70 leV. 9,25 In comparison with superconducting qubit cQED devices, which generally support Q > 50 000, 26 hybrid QD-cQED systems generally have Q ¼ 1000-3000. [15][16][17]19 To coherently couple QD qubits to cavity photons, higher quality factors are needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%