2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31715-6_47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Recommender System with Uncertainty on the Example of Political Elections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EU Profiler and EUandI for the 2009 and 2014/2019 elections to the European Parliament respectively, used matching algorithms based on empirically defined distance matrices (Garzia et al, 2015). In addition, Dyczkowski and Stachowiak (2012) proposed a matrix based on the Hausdorff distance which is defined as the maximum distance of a set to the nearest point in the other set. Louwerse and Rosema (2014) consider a few other algorithms that are not currently used by VAAs, while one could imagine that VAAs could also use algorithms with distance matrices based on correlation or agreement coefficients.…”
Section: Matching Citizen Preferences To Political Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EU Profiler and EUandI for the 2009 and 2014/2019 elections to the European Parliament respectively, used matching algorithms based on empirically defined distance matrices (Garzia et al, 2015). In addition, Dyczkowski and Stachowiak (2012) proposed a matrix based on the Hausdorff distance which is defined as the maximum distance of a set to the nearest point in the other set. Louwerse and Rosema (2014) consider a few other algorithms that are not currently used by VAAs, while one could imagine that VAAs could also use algorithms with distance matrices based on correlation or agreement coefficients.…”
Section: Matching Citizen Preferences To Political Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, government‐to‐citizen (G2C) is a solution where the authors in References 134‐138 propose autonomous city management to avoid such discrepancies. Citizens are encouraged to participate in public consultations where the authors in References 139‐141 present an intent‐aware voting recommender. This system links citizens to potential candidates based on their political views.…”
Section: Case Studies Of Iars For Smart Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With such tools, citizens are encouraged to contribute in public consultations. In this context, Terán and Meier (2010) and Dyczkowski and Stachowiak (2012) present recommendation solutions that assist voters in decision making by presenting candidates with similar political views. At the (electronic) participation level, the government offers online participation tools in which citizens propose, discuss and vote for projects and initiatives aimed to address a variety of issues and problems of a city, such as economic development, health care, education, culture, public safety, social rights, urban mobility, public transport, energy and environment.…”
Section: Recommender Systems and Smart Governancementioning
confidence: 99%