2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejfs.2014.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A recommended procedure for establishing the source level relationships between heroin case samples of unknown origins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been attempts to perform source comparisons using trace elements [40][41][42], however these have reported observations of sample grouping and similarity rather than clearly describing a method that could be used to compare two samples in forensic casework.…”
Section: Multivariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been attempts to perform source comparisons using trace elements [40][41][42], however these have reported observations of sample grouping and similarity rather than clearly describing a method that could be used to compare two samples in forensic casework.…”
Section: Multivariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of 2017, the DEA has formed a signature program for fentanyl and fentanyl analogs to study inter-sample variations akin to that of the Heroin Signature Program, established in 1977 [26][27][28] [6, 8, 9, 11-15, 18-20, 30-35]. While attempts to profile heroin using an inorganic analysis of elemental impurities have been investigated [7,[36][37][38][39], the method has yet to become adopted for provenance determination, but rather shows promise for conducting street-level sample comparisons [40,41]. Budic and Klemenc reported the first instance of microwave-assisted acid digestion for the analysis of major crustal elements in heroin by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation