1996
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests.

Abstract: The partial area index can be used as a more meaningful alternative to the conventional Az index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
174
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
174
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in A z and 090 A z ' between the experienced mammographer and the computerized method were found to be not statistically significant (two-tailed P values of 0.38 and 0.30) based on the evaluation from the CLABROC program (35,36) and the modified version of the CLABROC program (30). Results of the Student t test for paired data showed that the differences in A and """A ' between the z 0.90 z average performance of the five radiologists and the computerized method were both statistically significant (twotailed P values of .0131 and .0015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in A z and 090 A z ' between the experienced mammographer and the computerized method were found to be not statistically significant (two-tailed P values of 0.38 and 0.30) based on the evaluation from the CLABROC program (35,36) and the modified version of the CLABROC program (30). Results of the Student t test for paired data showed that the differences in A and """A ' between the z 0.90 z average performance of the five radiologists and the computerized method were both statistically significant (twotailed P values of .0131 and .0015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Clinically, the specificities at high sensitivity levels are most relevant because the "cost" of missing a cancer is greater than the cost of performing a biopsy to assess a benign lesion. Thus, the average performances in a high sensitivity range (true-positive fraction [TPF 0 ] above 0.90) were evaluated for both our classification schemes and the observers by using a partial area index, TPF A z ', from 0 to 1, which is the portion of the A that lies above a preselected sensitivity threshold (TPF 0 ) in a conventional ROC graph divided by the constant (1 -TPF 0 ) (30). These performances, in terms of specificity at a given sensitivity level, were also evaluated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall ROC area A z and the partial ROC area 0.90 A z were used as the reported performance indices. Although A z is the most common performance index for binary diagnostic tasks taking into account all possible decision thresholds, the partial ROC area index summarizes the detection performance for decision thresholds corresponding only to the high sensitivity portion (>90%) [46]. For our study, 0.90 A z is certainly a more appropriate performance index since any false-positive reduction scheme is expected to perform at a high cancer detection rate for a clinically effective cancer-screening CADe system.…”
Section: B Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure corresponds to the probability of a drug-medical event pair known to be an ADR being assigned a higher confidence of being within the ADR class by the framework than a drug-medical event pair known to be a non-ADR [22]. In particular, we restrict out attention to a partial area, as we are only interested in the section of the curve where few drug-medical event pairs are classed as side effects [23]. When many drug-medical event pairs are classed as ADRs, there are likely to be many non-ADRs pairs incorrectly classed as ADRs and this is undesirable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%