2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10764-022-00281-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reassessment of the Population Size, Demography, and Status of Tanzania’s Endemic Kipunji Rungwecebus kipunji 13 Years on: Demonstrating Conservation Success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our extended dataset allowed us to assess that following this decline populations remained apparently stable, albeit at very low levels of local abundance, with Tanzania Sykes' monkeys showing sign of recovery in the last 6 years, concomitant with the upgraded level of protection of the poorly protected forest and the initiation in 2017 of a protection program that implements monthly ground patrols lasting 4–5 days by a team of reserve rangers, village game scouts and armed soldiers from the regional anti‐poaching unit (Southern Tanzania Elephant Program, 2021). While the target primate species are relatively long‐lived (Jones, 2011) and hence a lag from the onset of protection to recovery is to be expected (Ewers & Didham, 2006; Nagelkerke et al, 2002), evidence from other studies shows that effective ground protection can be associated with relatively rapid population recovery (e.g., Chapman et al, 2018; kipunji, Rungwecebus kipunji : Davenport et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our extended dataset allowed us to assess that following this decline populations remained apparently stable, albeit at very low levels of local abundance, with Tanzania Sykes' monkeys showing sign of recovery in the last 6 years, concomitant with the upgraded level of protection of the poorly protected forest and the initiation in 2017 of a protection program that implements monthly ground patrols lasting 4–5 days by a team of reserve rangers, village game scouts and armed soldiers from the regional anti‐poaching unit (Southern Tanzania Elephant Program, 2021). While the target primate species are relatively long‐lived (Jones, 2011) and hence a lag from the onset of protection to recovery is to be expected (Ewers & Didham, 2006; Nagelkerke et al, 2002), evidence from other studies shows that effective ground protection can be associated with relatively rapid population recovery (e.g., Chapman et al, 2018; kipunji, Rungwecebus kipunji : Davenport et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, research and conservation efforts focused on primates may have the added benefits of preserving important ecological functions as well as other species (Gippoliti & Sousa, 2004; Lambert, 2010; Martins & Valladares‐Padua, 2005). However, the quantitative knowledge on abundance, conservation status, and vulnerability of threatened primates needed to promote sound conservation remains limited (Estrada et al, 2017), and rarely does this cover the entire range of species (e.g., Davenport et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many primate species are threatened, and an understanding of their population status and factors that contribute to their threatened status is crucial for developing informed conservation strategies (Estrada et al, 2017). The evaluation of population and habitat conservation requires long-term field monitoring, such as the monitoring of the primate populations of Kibale National Park, Uganda (Chapman et al, 2010;Sarkar et al, 2021) and of kipunjis (Rungwecebus kipunji) in Tanzania (Davenport et al, 2022). However, such long-term field data often are lacking (Kleiman et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%