2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-023-09663-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reassessment of Nemolestes (Mammalia, Metatheria): Systematics and evolutionary implications for Sparassodonta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rangel et al (2019) identi ed the m1 of Patene simpsoni as the most generalized of its lower molars, with less evident dental features indicative of carnivory (see also Rangel et al 2023a, b). On the contrary, the m2, and specially m3, of this species show proportionally smaller talonids in comparison with trigonids, which supports less developed protocones on antagonistic upper molars (M2-3) (see Rangel et al 2019Rangel et al , 2023a). An oppose condition is observed for the m1 of this species and the lower molars of Xenocynus crypticus, which show a talonid subequal to wider than the trigonid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Rangel et al (2019) identi ed the m1 of Patene simpsoni as the most generalized of its lower molars, with less evident dental features indicative of carnivory (see also Rangel et al 2023a, b). On the contrary, the m2, and specially m3, of this species show proportionally smaller talonids in comparison with trigonids, which supports less developed protocones on antagonistic upper molars (M2-3) (see Rangel et al 2019Rangel et al , 2023a). An oppose condition is observed for the m1 of this species and the lower molars of Xenocynus crypticus, which show a talonid subequal to wider than the trigonid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…2a), it is deductible that the protoconid of m4 e clearly more developed than the one of m3, and this one from the one of m2. This pattern is observable in most sparassodonts due to the increase in the size of the lower molars from m1 to m4 (see e.g., Rangel et al 2019Rangel et al , 2023aRangel et al , 2023bSuarez et al 2023). This morphology and the presence of short (= mesio-distally compressed) lingual alveolus of upper molars support the identi cation of these maxillae to a Sparassodonta.…”
Section: Zoobankmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations