1990
DOI: 10.1177/0893318990004001005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reassessment of Clarity in Written Managerial Communications

Abstract: Current thinking about effective written communication does not systematically assess the complex role that language plays in organizations. This article calls for a contingency view of communication clarity and effectiveness based on the impact that an organization's language customs have on perceived effectiveness. To justify this need for a contingency approach, we examine the psychological-social function of organizational language and discuss the role that language has in creating new knowledge in organiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although business and managerial communication researchers have stated for years that meaning exists in readers and is contingent on situational factors, much of the field's research (particularly presentations at annual and regional conferences), as the literature review demonstrates, continues to be acontextual, focusing on determining which document characteristics will always result in "clear," efficient, and effective writing. Clarity is generally perceived as an absolute, objective, acontextual gauge of a document's value (Suchan & Dulek, 1990). Bowden's (1993) observation that we depict documents as "containers" which we put meaning "into" and extract meaning "out of" helps explain why much business writing reseai-ch continues to be acontextual, focusing primarily on documents and backgrounding readers, the organizational tasks they are performing, and the organizational communities in which they are situated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although business and managerial communication researchers have stated for years that meaning exists in readers and is contingent on situational factors, much of the field's research (particularly presentations at annual and regional conferences), as the literature review demonstrates, continues to be acontextual, focusing on determining which document characteristics will always result in "clear," efficient, and effective writing. Clarity is generally perceived as an absolute, objective, acontextual gauge of a document's value (Suchan & Dulek, 1990). Bowden's (1993) observation that we depict documents as "containers" which we put meaning "into" and extract meaning "out of" helps explain why much business writing reseai-ch continues to be acontextual, focusing primarily on documents and backgrounding readers, the organizational tasks they are performing, and the organizational communities in which they are situated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suchan and Dulek (1990) assert that acceptable standards for written clarity are dictated by the organization or functional area in which the writer works. Adhering to a set of writing conventions allows members of a discourse community the benefit of interpreting information in a familiar way.…”
Section: F the Concept Of Discourse Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative for the writer is to not be allowed full membership and risk being perceived as an outsider. Suchan and Dulek (1990) maintain that, by accepting and internalizing a community's discourse conventions, members are signaling that they value and wish to continue being a part of that community.…”
Section: H the Importance Of Understanding A Community's Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, communication within a field has two goals: a task goal and a relational goal (Suchan and Dulek 1990). The task goal of communication is to transmit information accurately and efficiently.…”
Section: Influences On Tribalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Writers using the codes of the discourse community assure readers, particularly more powerful ones, that they view knowledge from the same philosophical and ideological perspective (Suchan and Dulek 1990). Recent research on discourse communities explores the way values, assumptions, and methods shared by readers and writers in a given academic field affect the type and nature of communication produced and accepted by both the readers and writers in that community (e.g., Hasrati and Street 2009;Melville 2008;Venclova 2007).…”
Section: Influences On Tribalismmentioning
confidence: 99%