2014
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2013.875465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reappraisal of the deconditioning hypothesis in low back pain: review of evidence from a triumvirate of research methods on specific lumbar extensor deconditioning

Abstract: The hypothesis of specific lumbar extensor deconditioning as being a causal factor in LBP is presently well supported. It is by no means the only causative factor and further research should more rigorously test this hypothesis addressing the methodological issues highlighted regarding previous studies. However, its role suggests specific exercise may be a worthwhile preventative and rehabilitative approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 186 publications
(291 reference statements)
1
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypothesis of specific lumbar extensor deconditioning as a causal factor in LBP is supported [9] by evidence suggesting that paraspinal muscles have significantly less contractility in patients with LBP than controls and significantly less contractility on the affected side in patients with unilateral LBP [10]. These factors along with other structural findings in the spine such as fat infiltration of the paraspinal musculature, decreased muscular quality and individual variations in muscular activation may contribute to recurrence of LBP [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hypothesis of specific lumbar extensor deconditioning as a causal factor in LBP is supported [9] by evidence suggesting that paraspinal muscles have significantly less contractility in patients with LBP than controls and significantly less contractility on the affected side in patients with unilateral LBP [10]. These factors along with other structural findings in the spine such as fat infiltration of the paraspinal musculature, decreased muscular quality and individual variations in muscular activation may contribute to recurrence of LBP [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active muscular structures are responsible for motion of the lumbar trunk in multiple directions [8]. Loss of strength and endurance of these muscles is considered predictive for the development of LBP [6, 9]. The extensors of the lumbar trunk; iliocostalis lumborum, longissimus thoracis and the deep and superficial portion of the lumbar multifidus muscle, (LMM) have been extensively studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite deficiencies in these areas having been linked to LBP,12 24 the use of free weight RT in the rehabilitation of those with LBP is limited. It is known that RT can alter muscle composition and illicit high levels of lumbar erector and other posterior chain muscle activity 25…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a proper biopsychosocial (BPS) diagnosis coupled with untreated psychological aspects reduced the effectiveness of his previous treatments. This enhances a catastrophic state [51] which is a crucial step in the fear-avoidance model [52], reducing his social and occupational functioning and further deconditions his muscles [53].…”
Section: The Patient's Psychosocial Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%