2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-008-9125-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reappraisal of shear wave splitting parameters from Italian active volcanic areas through a semiautomatic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that measurement 2, which is the nearest the array site of Piano Pernicana, shows similar spectral properties to the array area: i.e., the HVSR peak at about 1 Hz and the 160° polarization (see Figures 6, 8, and 11), although at a smaller level of HVSR amplitude (a peak amplitude of 4). It is also interesting that our finding of a predominant north‐south polarization (excluding the sites near the NE rift) observed through tremor data is consistent with the fast polarization direction found by Bianco and Zaccarelli [2009]. Bianco and Zaccarelli used shear wave splitting analysis on local earthquakes recorded on the eastern flank of Mount Etna by local seismic stations (see Figure 12) considering different time periods including the 1989 and 2001 eruption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Note that measurement 2, which is the nearest the array site of Piano Pernicana, shows similar spectral properties to the array area: i.e., the HVSR peak at about 1 Hz and the 160° polarization (see Figures 6, 8, and 11), although at a smaller level of HVSR amplitude (a peak amplitude of 4). It is also interesting that our finding of a predominant north‐south polarization (excluding the sites near the NE rift) observed through tremor data is consistent with the fast polarization direction found by Bianco and Zaccarelli [2009]. Bianco and Zaccarelli used shear wave splitting analysis on local earthquakes recorded on the eastern flank of Mount Etna by local seismic stations (see Figure 12) considering different time periods including the 1989 and 2001 eruption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The polarization of earthquakes (white squares) is also drawn. Diagrams in white circles show the results of velocity anisotropy found by Bianco et al [1996] and Bianco and Zaccarelli [2007] using earthquakes recorded at the stations in the map (gray triangles).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…S1 and Supplementary Table S1). Although this result may seem surprising when considering the dramatic changes in f within the caldera, small changes in the magnitude of anisotropy can create large variations in f because f and dt are not coupled linearly, particularly when the mechanism of anisotropy varies 9,12 . At the times of the 2008 changes, therefore, subtle variations in dt may be masked by scatter in the measurements 11 .…”
Section: Sws Delay Timesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is mounting evidence, however, that the dominant mechanism for SWS can switch between a static condition, such as aligned fractures in fault zones, and a dynamic process, such as maximum horizontal compressive stress causing aligned microcracks to dilate 9,10 . In areas where there are strong changes in maximum compressive stress direction and magnitude on observable timescales, such as at active volcanoes, SWS analysis has proven a valuable tool when combined with ground deformation or other seismological observations for interpretation of volcanic processes such as magma migration [8][9][10][11][12][13] . Such changes are always detected in hindsight, however, and seismologists struggle to employ monitoring of seismic anisotropy in real-or near-real-time to assist in eruption forecasting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%