2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab48fc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reanalysis of the Fundamental Parameters and Age of TRAPPIST-1*

Abstract: We present the distance-calibrated spectral energy distribution (SED) of TRAPPIST-1 using a new medium resolution (R∼6000) near-infrared FIRE spectrum and its Gaia parallax. We report an updated bolometric luminosity (L bol ) of −3.216 ± 0.016, along with semi-empirical fundamental parameters: effective temperature T eff = 2628 ± 42 K, mass=90 ± 8 M Jup , radius=1.16 ± 0.03 R Jup , and log g=5.21 ± 0.06 dex. It's kinematics point toward an older age while spectral indices indicate youth therefore, we compare t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
(157 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between the two classifications is thought to be around 0.5 dex in log(g) (see Figure 9 of Burrows et al 1997), so a simple calculation shows that a radius increase of 10× would be needed to achieve the effect. Gonzales et al (2019) has further noted that the late-M dwarf TRAPPIST-1, though presumably of field age, nonetheless has near-infrared spectral indices indicating an intermediate gravity. If this star's radius is truly inflated, it could be due to magnetic activity or to tidal interactions by the numerous planets in its solar system.…”
Section: Low-gravity (Young) Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between the two classifications is thought to be around 0.5 dex in log(g) (see Figure 9 of Burrows et al 1997), so a simple calculation shows that a radius increase of 10× would be needed to achieve the effect. Gonzales et al (2019) has further noted that the late-M dwarf TRAPPIST-1, though presumably of field age, nonetheless has near-infrared spectral indices indicating an intermediate gravity. If this star's radius is truly inflated, it could be due to magnetic activity or to tidal interactions by the numerous planets in its solar system.…”
Section: Low-gravity (Young) Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that prior to this paper different stellar parameters for TRAPPIST-1 were published. In 2019, Gonzales et al (2019) presented a distance-calibrated SED of TRAPPIST-1 using a new NIR FIRE spectrum and parallax from the Gaia DR2 data release from which they derived updated fundamental parameters for the star. Back in 2018, Van Grootel et al (2018) derived stellar parameters from two distinct approaches to compute the mass of the star, first via stellar evolution modeling, and second through an empirical derivation from dynamical masses of equivalently classified ultracool dwarfs in astrometric binaries.…”
Section: Global Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Derived for age range 0.5 to 10 Gyr, the field age constraint from Filippazzo et al (2015), see Gonzales et al (2019). Table 7.…”
Section: Global Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we acknowledge that the density should be better constrained than either the mass or radius, because it can be computed without the stellar uncertainty . Note that the stellar radius estimate may also be biased by (i) magnetic activity effects and/or (ii) tidal interactions of the planets with the star (Burgasser and Mamajek 2017;Gonzales et al 2019) which are not included in existing stellar evolution models. Secondly, stellar contamination of the photosphere of TRAPPIST-1 by spots need to be further investigated, as it was shown to be a potential source of bias-up to ∼2.5% for TRAPPIST-1 in the infrared Spitzer IRAC bands-for the radius estimates .…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%