2021
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e21056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A real-world study of camrelizumab in the treatment of advanced lung cancer patients.

Abstract: e21056 Background: Camrelizumab, as a humanized antibody against PD-1, has shown high efficiency and survival benefits in clinical studies on lung cancer treatment. This study aims to observe the efficacy and safety of Camrelizumab in the treatment of advanced lung cancer in the real world. Methods: This is a prospective, open, multi-center observational study that includes patients with advanced lung cancer who are older than 18 years of age, regardless of gender, with an ECOG score of 0-2. Results: As of No… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was higher than the results reported periodically in the two prospective observational studies (25% and 26%) (11,12). Interestingly, despite the comparatively lower ORR observed in real-world settings, the DCR (85.1%) was generally comparable among the pivotal trials (CameL: 87.8% for non-squamous NSCLC; CameL-sq: 88.1% for squamous NSCLC) (7,8) and observational studies (83.40% and 89.30%) (11,12). These variations may be partially explained by different patient characteristics and treatment variables.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it was higher than the results reported periodically in the two prospective observational studies (25% and 26%) (11,12). Interestingly, despite the comparatively lower ORR observed in real-world settings, the DCR (85.1%) was generally comparable among the pivotal trials (CameL: 87.8% for non-squamous NSCLC; CameL-sq: 88.1% for squamous NSCLC) (7,8) and observational studies (83.40% and 89.30%) (11,12). These variations may be partially explained by different patient characteristics and treatment variables.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The ORR (40.2%) observed in our cohort was lower than observed in firstline trials (CameL: 60.5% for non-squamous NSCLC; CameL-sq: 64.8% for squamous NSCLC) (7,8). However, it was higher than the results reported periodically in the two prospective observational studies (25% and 26%) (11,12). Interestingly, despite the comparatively lower ORR observed in real-world settings, the DCR (85.1%) was generally comparable among the pivotal trials (CameL: 87.8% for non-squamous NSCLC; CameL-sq: 88.1% for squamous NSCLC) (7,8) and observational studies (83.40% and 89.30%) (11,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%