2022
DOI: 10.1177/17588359221119539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A real-world analysis of nanoliposomal-irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as third- or later-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Background: Nanoliposomal encapsulation of irinotecan (nal-IRI) with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) has shown a survival benefit for gemcitabine-pretreated patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV for use beyond second-line treatment after standard frontline therapy for mPAC. Method: This multicenter, retrospective, non-comparative observational study included mPAC patients who received nal-IRI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficacy of 5‐FU/LV‐nal‐IRI was thus reproducible in 11 different centers across Italy and in a less favorably selected population: our cohort was older (age range: 30–83 vs. 57–70 years) and had worse general conditions (ECOG PS ≥1: 56% vs. 41%) than the pivotal trial 12,13 . Six‐ and 12‐month PFS and OS rates were in line with both the NAPOLI‐1 trial 12,13 and real‐world analyses 15–21 . With respect to prior treatment, only 55% of patients in the NAPOLI‐1 trial received Gem combination treatment, 12,13 but most patients (79%) in our study were treated with Gem‐NabP as first‐line.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The efficacy of 5‐FU/LV‐nal‐IRI was thus reproducible in 11 different centers across Italy and in a less favorably selected population: our cohort was older (age range: 30–83 vs. 57–70 years) and had worse general conditions (ECOG PS ≥1: 56% vs. 41%) than the pivotal trial 12,13 . Six‐ and 12‐month PFS and OS rates were in line with both the NAPOLI‐1 trial 12,13 and real‐world analyses 15–21 . With respect to prior treatment, only 55% of patients in the NAPOLI‐1 trial received Gem combination treatment, 12,13 but most patients (79%) in our study were treated with Gem‐NabP as first‐line.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The proportions of patients with prior 5-FU and platinum were also lower, but there was no signi cant difference when compared with other clinical trials [13]. In addition, there was no signi cant difference in patient backgrounds compared to other real-world clinical observational studies [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Therefore, our study cohort is reasonable and similar with those in previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The clinical deterioration and poor prognosis of refractory patients greatly limit the number of candidates for further-line treatment. 31 36 Nevertheless, the availability of more effective standard first- and second-line chemotherapies (i.e. FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel in first line, NALIRI after gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy) and improvements in supportive care during the last decade have improved OS of PDAC patients, thus progressively increasing the number of patients who are eligible for further-line treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%