Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2554850.2555191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A real-time smartphone- and smartshoe-based fall prevention system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These tests have to be conducted in a supervised environment and may therefore suffer from influences such as the Hawthorne effect, that is, the reaction in which the individual modifies his/her behavior due to his/her awareness of being observed. Unlike the clinical assessment tests, a real-time fall risk is predicted by recognizing an abnormal walking pattern, then the user is alerted [ 17 19 , 31 ], or an external aid such as a walker or robot is exploited to prevent the fall [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tests have to be conducted in a supervised environment and may therefore suffer from influences such as the Hawthorne effect, that is, the reaction in which the individual modifies his/her behavior due to his/her awareness of being observed. Unlike the clinical assessment tests, a real-time fall risk is predicted by recognizing an abnormal walking pattern, then the user is alerted [ 17 19 , 31 ], or an external aid such as a walker or robot is exploited to prevent the fall [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habib et al [ 35 ] noted that individuals may not place their smartphone in a garment of clothing that they are wearing whilst at home, limiting the ability of the smartphone to monitor physical movement in the home. That being said, older adults have shown a preference to place a smartphone in a pocket of their clothing rather than wear a dedicated device [ 138 ] when given the option, a preference which may extend to other subpopulations when asked to wear a non-invasive monitor for their health. At present, it is unclear if methods need to be developed to identify these periods when the smartphone is not placed on the body, as well as developing mechanisms or strategies to facilitate non-invasive monitoring during these times.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this work does not provide any information about falls severity regarding the surface where object hits. Similarly, the work presented in [Majumder et al 2013] describes the "iPrevention" system. Built inside a smartphone, it is in charge to detect elderly patients falls identifying high-risk ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some related proposals try to recognize user behavior considering mobile devices inertial sensors, such as accelerometer and gyroscope. Data coming from these sensors may allow special applications infer whether a device/user is falling to the ground or not [Majumder et al 2013] [Mehner et al 2013]. Although imperative, knowing when a device/user is falling is not enough by itself without having surface dangerousness estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%