1988
DOI: 10.1080/09511928808944350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A real-time production scheduler for a stochastic manufacturing environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An integer center C of the segment [p L i , p U i ] was generated using a uniform distribution in the range [1,100]. The lower bound p L i of the possible processing time p i was determined using the equality …”
Section: For the Benchmark Instances 1|pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An integer center C of the segment [p L i , p U i ] was generated using a uniform distribution in the range [1,100]. The lower bound p L i of the possible processing time p i was determined using the equality …”
Section: For the Benchmark Instances 1|pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a stochastic approach, job processing times are assumed to be random variables with the known probability distributions [1,2]. If one has no sufficient information to characterize the probability distribution of all random processing times, other approaches are needed [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davis and Jones [DAV88] used this approach to deconpose scheduling into a two-level decision-making problem (see Figure 6) . They use both pricedirected and goal-directed methods to ensure coordination of objective functions and constraints.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will then use that plan, together with start and finish times from its supervisor, to determine an exact schedule. The framework outlined in [DAV88] will be used to distribute both of these decisions across the AME^shop floor hierarchy.…”
Section: The Amrf Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An on-line simulation methodology is proposed by Davis and Jones [6] to analyze several scheduling rules in a stochastic job-shop. Nof compare three types of automatic recovery procedures, such as rerouting, splitting orders and rescheduling, when disruption events occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%