2016 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/is3c.2016.256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Real-Time FPGA Based Human Detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the implementation from Negi et al [ 17 ], the memory utilization in this study is significantly lower than theirs, and the resolution is higher. In the implementation from Hsiao et al [ 18 ], their LUTs, registers, DSP blocks, and memory are all less than this study’s. However, their implementation is not accomplished all in hardware.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the implementation from Negi et al [ 17 ], the memory utilization in this study is significantly lower than theirs, and the resolution is higher. In the implementation from Hsiao et al [ 18 ], their LUTs, registers, DSP blocks, and memory are all less than this study’s. However, their implementation is not accomplished all in hardware.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Some prior works have realized pedestrian detection based on a FPGA, such as [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. In early years, Kadota et al [ 16 ] proposed several methods to simplify the computation, such as the square root and arctangent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature also contains reports on HOG implementations in FPGAs, especially for pedestrian detection [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. For us, it is interesting to note that they also include some previously introduced simplifications of HOG calculation, which are mostly implementation-related simplifications, rather than intrinsic algorithm changes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%