2018
DOI: 10.2478/fiqf-2018-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Real Or a Marginal Trend in Participatory Budgets in Local Governments

Abstract: The purpose of the article is analysis of participatory budgets as a tool for shaping decisions of local communities on the use of public funds. The authors ask the question of whether the current practice of using the participatory budget is actually a growing trend in local government finances or, after the initial euphoria resulting from participation, society ceased to notice the real possibilities of influencing the directions of public expenditures as an opportunity to legislate public policies implement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This challenge to established practice which had the intention of enhancing transparency, participation and democratic accountability is spreading internationally with different interpretations and practices shaped by different institutions, social and political consequences (Ebdon. and Franklin, 2004;Binda and Niedziela, 2021;Filiplak and Dylewski, 2018;Brun-Martos and Lapsey, 2017;Patsias, Latendresse and Bherer, 2013;Ahmad and Weiser, 2006;Fölscher, 2007) In some cases, the official position on participatory budgeting has been rather limited, being restricted to the recommendation of pilot studies. However, there was also evidence of citizen path, but where citizens connected with the idea, these initiatives enhanced both democratic accountability and transparency in public finance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This challenge to established practice which had the intention of enhancing transparency, participation and democratic accountability is spreading internationally with different interpretations and practices shaped by different institutions, social and political consequences (Ebdon. and Franklin, 2004;Binda and Niedziela, 2021;Filiplak and Dylewski, 2018;Brun-Martos and Lapsey, 2017;Patsias, Latendresse and Bherer, 2013;Ahmad and Weiser, 2006;Fölscher, 2007) In some cases, the official position on participatory budgeting has been rather limited, being restricted to the recommendation of pilot studies. However, there was also evidence of citizen path, but where citizens connected with the idea, these initiatives enhanced both democratic accountability and transparency in public finance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%