2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-015-1008-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Re-Parameterized and Improved Nonlinear Muskingum Model for Flood Routing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Muskingum routing method has been improved by many researchers since it was proposed in 1939 (Koussis, 2009;McCarthy, 1939). Most of these theoretical studies on the Muskingum method include model validation (Afzali and Niazkar, 2015), analysis of model structure, model structure improvement (Haddad et al, 2015), and calibration of model parameters by considering the temporally varying factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Muskingum routing method has been improved by many researchers since it was proposed in 1939 (Koussis, 2009;McCarthy, 1939). Most of these theoretical studies on the Muskingum method include model validation (Afzali and Niazkar, 2015), analysis of model structure, model structure improvement (Haddad et al, 2015), and calibration of model parameters by considering the temporally varying factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model used the cuckoo algorithm and predicted peak discharge more accurately than other models. The shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) based on a three-parameter Muskingum model was used for flood routing [25]. Results showed that the SSD and SAD values for the SFLA were lower than those of the GA, PSO and nonlinear programming methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original paper estimated the Muskingum parameters by posing them as unknown variables. An initial condition is needed to estimate the parameter S 0 (the initial river-reach storage), and for this purpose, the initial condition I 0 ¼ O 0 is applied in the flood routing, in which I 0 denotes the initial reach inflow and O 0 denotes the initial calculated outflow (e.g., Chow 1959;Das 2007;Chu and Chang 2009;Orouji et al 2012;Easa 2013;Hamedi et al 2014;Bozorg-Haddad et al 2015a). The authors intended to improve the initial condition to produce a well-calibrated Muskingum model in the original paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussers compared the results of the NL4 Muskingum model with those of the NL5-1 and NL5-2 models. These three models employ optimization methods that include the Excel Solver, the shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA), and the Nelder-Mead simplex (NMS) (Bozorg-Haddad et al 2015a). The results of the evolutionary and metaheuristic algorithms must be compared in terms of the number of functional evaluations required for convergence (Solgi et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation