1962
DOI: 10.1071/bi9620413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Re-Examination of the Relative Turgidity Technique for Estimating Water Deficits in Leaves

Abstract: SummaryThe relative turgidity technique consists in comparing the initial and turgid water contents, on a percentage basis, of disks punched from leaves, the turgid water content being obtained by floating the disks on water.Three main sources of error associated with flotation are recognized: (1) changes in dry weight of the disks; (2) continued increase in water content after the attain· ment of full turgidity; (3) injection of the intercellular spaces at the cut edges of the disks.An examination of these so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
1,305
1
17

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,746 publications
(1,416 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(17 reference statements)
3
1,305
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Stress injury The stress injury was measured using some indicators like electrolyte leakage (Premchandra et al (1990), total chlorophyll content (Arnon 1949), 2,3,5 triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) reduction ability (Steponkus and Lanphear 1967) and relative leaf water content (Barrs and Weatherley (1962), which have been described previously (Nayyar and Gupta 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress injury The stress injury was measured using some indicators like electrolyte leakage (Premchandra et al (1990), total chlorophyll content (Arnon 1949), 2,3,5 triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) reduction ability (Steponkus and Lanphear 1967) and relative leaf water content (Barrs and Weatherley (1962), which have been described previously (Nayyar and Gupta 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf samples were oven-dried at 80°C for 24 h and weighed (Barrs and Weatherley 1962). RLWC was calculated as shown below and expressed as %:…”
Section: Pot Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leaves were weighed (fw -fresh weight), and then soaked in freshly deionized water for 12 h in darkness at 5°C and their turgid weight (tw) was determined. The samples were then oven-dried at 80°C for 72 h and weighed (dw -dry weight) (Barrs and Weatherley 1962;Turner 1981).…”
Section: Soil Water Content (Swc)mentioning
confidence: 99%