1986
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3290110302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A re‐examination of the evidence for a Plio‐Pleistocene marine transgression on the Chiltern Hills. III. deposits

Abstract: A petrological re-examination of the deposits that Wooldridge and Linton used as evidence for a Plio-Pleistocene marine transgression on the Chiltern Hills indicates that many are fluvial and some have been reworked in a periglacial climate. However, those from Little Heath and Rothamsted, Hertfordshire and Lane End, Buckinghamshire are confirmed as marine and Plio-Pleistocene. Subsidence during the Pleistocene is suggested by the northeasterly decline in height of the few truly marine deposits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed John (1974John ( , 1980 has shown for the Netley Heath type site on the Surrey North Downs that the bench is not a wave-cut platform but a flexured facet of the Sub-Palaeogene Surface. Similar conclusions were reached following an intensive study of the extensive platforms preserved on the Chiltern backslopes (Moffat et al 1986) which established that they are structurally controlled, although the authors added that 'it is possible that marine erosion before deposition of the Reading Beds (Palaeocene) played a small role in its formation' (p. 105), before concluding that the bench has 'no value as erosional evidence for a Plio-Pleistocene marine transgression' (p. 105). Neither study entirely dismissed the idea of the Plio-Pleistocene marine transgression extending over parts of the platform at a higher elevation.…”
Section: Criticisms Of the Wooldridge And Linton Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed John (1974John ( , 1980 has shown for the Netley Heath type site on the Surrey North Downs that the bench is not a wave-cut platform but a flexured facet of the Sub-Palaeogene Surface. Similar conclusions were reached following an intensive study of the extensive platforms preserved on the Chiltern backslopes (Moffat et al 1986) which established that they are structurally controlled, although the authors added that 'it is possible that marine erosion before deposition of the Reading Beds (Palaeocene) played a small role in its formation' (p. 105), before concluding that the bench has 'no value as erosional evidence for a Plio-Pleistocene marine transgression' (p. 105). Neither study entirely dismissed the idea of the Plio-Pleistocene marine transgression extending over parts of the platform at a higher elevation.…”
Section: Criticisms Of the Wooldridge And Linton Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As this platform carries evidence for marine activity in terms of patches of sand (Headley Sands, Surrey) and solution pipe in-fills (Lenham Beds, Kent), together with fragments of fossiliferous ironstone (Netley Heath in Surrey, Rothamsted in Hertfordshire) (see Fig. 8), it was interpreted as a marine plain of Pliocene age (Wooldridge 1927; for reviews see Worssam 1963Worssam , 1973Jones 1974Jones , 1980Jones , 1981John 1980;John & Fisher 1984;Moffat & Catt 1986). …”
Section: The Wooldridge and Linton Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Basic rock types seem to be an insignificant component, if present (Hey, 1976;Moffat & Catt, 1986;Whiteman & Rose, 1992).…”
Section: Discussion Of Glaciological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Later research was able to involve a greater concentration on, and technical knowledge of, residual deposits and weathering products associated with particular surfaces (Clark et al 1967;Summerfield & Goudie 1980;Catt 1983;Green 1985;Moffat & Catt 1986;Ulyott et al 1998). In general, these studies have thrown considerable doubt on the earlier Wooldridge & Linton model, as weathering products, like the widespread Clay-withflints on the Chalk, have not proved to be what they initially seemed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%