1996
DOI: 10.13182/fst96-a30706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Re-Examination of Spheromak Experiments and Opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not at all consistent with observations based on heat confinement in CTX that time-averaged fluctuations involved in heat transport during field decay are many orders of magnitude weaker than this (a time-averaged "free energy" of order S-r = 10-r in experiments) [7].…”
contrasting
confidence: 82%
“…This is not at all consistent with observations based on heat confinement in CTX that time-averaged fluctuations involved in heat transport during field decay are many orders of magnitude weaker than this (a time-averaged "free energy" of order S-r = 10-r in experiments) [7].…”
contrasting
confidence: 82%
“…It has been suggested that although the global confinement time of spheromaks is not attractive for a fusion reactor, it is possible that core confinement is very good. 27 The fact that 11 T e~ 400 eV and that hard X rays 28 were observed in decaying CTX spheromaks suggests good core confinement during decay. However, this observation raises the following question: Why was good confinement not observed during sustainment?…”
Section: Proposed Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] The robustness of forming a spheromak in the laboratory using a variety of helicity injection schemes 7 is another potential advantage over more complicated and expensive setup for q Ͼ 1 devices such as tokamaks and stellerators. [3][4][5][6] The robustness of forming a spheromak in the laboratory using a variety of helicity injection schemes 7 is another potential advantage over more complicated and expensive setup for q Ͼ 1 devices such as tokamaks and stellerators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%