A Re‐Appraisal of the Fertility Response to the Australian Baby Bonus

Abstract

The Australian baby bonus offering parents $3,000 on the birth of a new child was announced on 11 May 2004. The availability of five years of birth data following the introduction of the baby bonus allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the policy implications than is current in the literature. The focus of this paper is to identify if there is a positive fertility choice response to the introduction of the Australian baby bonus policy and if this response is sustained over time. To do this, 19 years of birth and macroeconomic data, beginning in 1990, is analysed using an unobservable components model. The results indicate a significant increase in birth numbers ten months following the announcement of the baby bonus, and this overall increase was sustained up to the end of the observed period. A cumulative growth in birth numbers which commenced in January 2006 slows in 2008 and 2009. It is suggested that the initial increase in births, identified in March 2005, is a direct fertility response to the introduction of the policy, and that the subsequent change in the growth of birth numbers may be the result of a delayed effect working through a number of channels. We estimate that approximately 108,000 births are attributable to the baby bonus over the period, at an approximate cost of $43,000 per extra child.

Can increased educational attainment explain declining Indigenous fertility?

“…Another potential explanation for the within‐education level changes is, therefore, a universal policy change that affects fertility at all levels of education. Studies suggest that the Baby Bonus programme stimulated fertility (Roberts, Raynes‐Greenow & Morris ; Drago, Sawyer, Shreffler, Warren & Wooden ; Sinclair, Boymal & De Silva ) and that the fertility response was greater for younger women living in economically disadvantaged areas (Rawlings, Robson & Ding ). Although there is no strong quantitative evidence showing the fertility effect of the Baby Bonus varies by Indigenous status (Langridge, Nassar, Li, Jacoby & Stanley ), anecdotal evidence suggests that the fertility response was greater among younger and poorer women (Lattimore & Pobke ).…”

Sailing close to the wind? The effects of third birth policies in post-communist Hungary.

“…It is relevant here to emphasize that ANB encouraged the birth of third children. The "baby bonus" introduced in Australia and subsequently popular elsewhere was likewise found to promote fertility (Drago et al, 2013;Sinclair et al, 2012). Not so the "baby bonus"-type "maternal capital" introduced in Russia expressly to raise fertility and offering sizeable monetary support, which according to Frejka and Zakharov (2013) simply affected timing (brought births forward).…”

The Plain Truth about Plain Packaging: An Econometric Analysis of the Australian 2011 Tobacco Plain Packaging Act

“…10 Many economic studies have utilised this approach to assess economic policy and concepts (see, Harvey and Durbin 1986;Tawados 2009;and Sinclair et al 2012, for example).…”