2016
DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.8101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rational Foundation for Software Metrology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traceability discussion echoes commentary from Antonio Possolo. The motivation section similarly echoes the findings of a group of NIST colleagues [ 8 ].…”
Section: Acknowledgmentssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The traceability discussion echoes commentary from Antonio Possolo. The motivation section similarly echoes the findings of a group of NIST colleagues [ 8 ].…”
Section: Acknowledgmentssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…There are far too many proposed measures to evaluate or even list here. We can state that, as alluded to above, measures should be firmly based on well-established science and have a rational foundation in metrology to have the greatest utility [Flater16].…”
Section: Existing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%