1970
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1970.tb02066.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects

Abstract: A modification of an earlier rating scale for extrapyramidal system disturbance is described, and evidence for the validity and reliability of the scale is presented. The usefulness of the scale in studies of neuroleptic drugs is discussed. By its application it is possible to quantify extrapyramidal side effects and to separate them into four principal factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
1,325
1
12

Year Published

1972
1972
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,032 publications
(1,364 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
1,325
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse events, physical examination, vital signs, body weight, laboratory parameters and the following neurological scales: the Simpson Angus Scale (Simpson and Angus 1970) for parkinsonism, the Barnes Akathisia Scale (Barnes 1989) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) (National Institute of Mental Health 1976b) for dyskinesia.…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse events, physical examination, vital signs, body weight, laboratory parameters and the following neurological scales: the Simpson Angus Scale (Simpson and Angus 1970) for parkinsonism, the Barnes Akathisia Scale (Barnes 1989) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) (National Institute of Mental Health 1976b) for dyskinesia.…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary psychometric and neurologic examinations included CGI-S, CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) (US Department of Health, 1976a); PANSS (Kay et al, 1987); MontgomeryAsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) (US Department of Health, 1976b), Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) (Simpson and Angus, 1970); Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) (Barnes, 1989), Patient Perception of Function Scale (PPFS) (MacEwan et al, 2001), and Role Functioning Scale (RFS) (McPheeters, 1984).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with overall two mild ratings or at least one moderate or high rating in any of the categories on AIMS scale (a single evaluation) was used as the threshold for diagnosis of TD, following the RDC-TD. 39 The Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) 40 was used for additional assessment. Other inclusion criteria were the availability of antipsychotic treatment history (for at least 3 months).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%