2022
DOI: 10.18844/cjes.v17i11.7792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rasch model analysis of the TPACK instrument in the creative teaching of primary mathematics teachers

Abstract: Utilising the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) instrument, mathematics teachers were evaluated on their level of TPACK in their creative teaching practices. Using Rasch model analysis, this study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the TPACK instrument. A 30-item survey with a 5-point Likert scale was given at random to 77 primary school teachers. In order to analyse the data and evaluate the instrument using the Rasch model analysis test, including the item and person separation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, creativity is a vital component of teaching mathematics, and mathematics teachers have a unique opportunity to foster creativity among their students. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of incorporating creative teaching methods in mathematics education (Christofferson, 2021;Fadzil et al, 2022;Elsayed & Al-Abbad, 2023;Henriksen & Mehta, 2016;Kandemir et al, 2019;Niu et al, 2017;Sholan, 2019; ). These methods go beyond the traditional approach of memorisation and formulaic problem-solving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, creativity is a vital component of teaching mathematics, and mathematics teachers have a unique opportunity to foster creativity among their students. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of incorporating creative teaching methods in mathematics education (Christofferson, 2021;Fadzil et al, 2022;Elsayed & Al-Abbad, 2023;Henriksen & Mehta, 2016;Kandemir et al, 2019;Niu et al, 2017;Sholan, 2019; ). These methods go beyond the traditional approach of memorisation and formulaic problem-solving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%