Abstract:Cytoplasmic dynein, a microtubule-based motor protein, transports many intracellular cargos by means of its light intermediate chain (LIC). In this study, we have determined the crystal structure of the conserved LIC domain, which binds the motor heavy chain, from a thermophilic fungus. We show that the LIC has a Ras-like fold with insertions that distinguish it from Ras and other previously described G proteins. Despite having a G protein fold, the fungal LIC has lost its ability to bind nucleotide, while the… Show more
“…We also docked a homology model of the human LIC into our map (Figure S2D). The LIC binds to the HC bundles 6 and 7 (Figure 2B) using a series of conserved hydrophobic residues near its N terminus, in agreement with previous predictions (Schroeder et al., 2014) (Figure S2E).Figure 2Architecture of the Dynein-1 Tail(A) An unsharpened map of the tail, low-pass filtered to 15 Å. Subunits are colored as in the cartoon. The heavy chain (HC) N-terminal dimerization domain (NDD) holds HC A and HC B together.…”
SummaryCytoplasmic dynein-1 binds dynactin and cargo adaptor proteins to form a transport machine capable of long-distance processive movement along microtubules. However, it is unclear why dynein-1 moves poorly on its own or how it is activated by dynactin. Here, we present a cryoelectron microscopy structure of the complete 1.4-megadalton human dynein-1 complex in an inhibited state known as the phi-particle. We reveal the 3D structure of the cargo binding dynein tail and show how self-dimerization of the motor domains locks them in a conformation with low microtubule affinity. Disrupting motor dimerization with structure-based mutagenesis drives dynein-1 into an open form with higher affinity for both microtubules and dynactin. We find the open form is also inhibited for movement and that dynactin relieves this by reorienting the motor domains to interact correctly with microtubules. Our model explains how dynactin binding to the dynein-1 tail directly stimulates its motor activity.
“…We also docked a homology model of the human LIC into our map (Figure S2D). The LIC binds to the HC bundles 6 and 7 (Figure 2B) using a series of conserved hydrophobic residues near its N terminus, in agreement with previous predictions (Schroeder et al., 2014) (Figure S2E).Figure 2Architecture of the Dynein-1 Tail(A) An unsharpened map of the tail, low-pass filtered to 15 Å. Subunits are colored as in the cartoon. The heavy chain (HC) N-terminal dimerization domain (NDD) holds HC A and HC B together.…”
SummaryCytoplasmic dynein-1 binds dynactin and cargo adaptor proteins to form a transport machine capable of long-distance processive movement along microtubules. However, it is unclear why dynein-1 moves poorly on its own or how it is activated by dynactin. Here, we present a cryoelectron microscopy structure of the complete 1.4-megadalton human dynein-1 complex in an inhibited state known as the phi-particle. We reveal the 3D structure of the cargo binding dynein tail and show how self-dimerization of the motor domains locks them in a conformation with low microtubule affinity. Disrupting motor dimerization with structure-based mutagenesis drives dynein-1 into an open form with higher affinity for both microtubules and dynactin. We find the open form is also inhibited for movement and that dynactin relieves this by reorienting the motor domains to interact correctly with microtubules. Our model explains how dynactin binding to the dynein-1 tail directly stimulates its motor activity.
“…Many of those proteins were found with induced phosphorylations only in Tconv cells, whereas these responses are even repressed in Treg cells. This includes DC1L1/LIC1, a subunit of the dynein complex, that is supposed to determine cargo load . In contrast, Treg cell‐specific induced phosphorylations were identified at SMCR8 and TIAM, of which the latter is required for LFA‐1 integrin activation .…”
Regulatory T (Treg) cells require T-cell receptor (TCR) signalling to exert their immunosuppressive activity, but the precise organization of the TCR signalling network compared to conventional T (Tconv) cells remains elusive. By using accurate mass spectrometry and multi-epitope ligand cartography (MELC) we characterized TCR signalling and recruitment of TCR signalling components to the immunological synapse (IS) in
www.eji-journal.euThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2Marco van Ham et al. Eur. J. Immunol. 2017. 0: 1-16 in Treg cells, thereby, seems to be differentially organized as in Tconv cells: Treg cells show reduced Ca 2+ flux and ERK1/2 phosphorylation upon TCR stimulation [6][7][8], and downstream signalling molecules such as Lck, LAT and PLCγ1 are essential for Treg cell suppressive capacity [9,10]. In this line, a novel TCRmediated ADAP/integrin-independent PLCγ1 activation pathway was described to be required for suppression of Tconv cells by Treg cells [11]. Furthermore, Treg cells exhibit reduced S473 phosphorylation of Akt which seems a prerequisite for suppression [12]. Although the enzymatic activity of the tyrosine kinase ZAP70 seems to be dispensable for the suppressive phenotype of Foxp3 + Treg cells [13], a single mutation within the SH2-domain of ZAP70 leads to impaired suppressive activities, which indicated its importance at the immunological synapse (IS) [14]. Finally, it has only recently been recognized that the recruitment of TCR signalling components into the IS is differentially organized in Treg cells and Tconv cells. The protein kinase PKCθ is recruited to the IS in Tconv cells, in Treg cells, however, this kinase was found to be sequestered away from the IS, but still of importance to control suppression [15]. The spatial recruitment of signalling components during IS formation critically depends on cytoskeleton dynamics, which in turn is controlled by TCR activation and subsequent phosphorylation of proteins regulating cytoskeleton reorganization [5]. As part of these processes the microtubule-organizing centre (MTOC) is rapidly translocated in proximity to the IS. MTOC repositioning depends on LAT, ZAP70 and SLP76 [16] and is regulated by a cascade of distinct isoforms of the family of novel protein kinase C (nPKC) [17]. The MTOC serves as a platform to coordinate molecular movements from and to the IS through the support of microtubule (MT) motors [18]. For instance, TCR microclusters move along MTs towards the centre of the IS in a dynein-dependent manner [19], and hindrance of MTOC polarization, molecular transport and cytoskeleton dynamics prevent proper propagation of TCR signals [20].It is now tempting to speculate that the localization of signalling modules within the IS may be instrumental for the formation of a Treg cell-specific IS and the suppressive phenotype of Treg cells. At this moment, however,...
“…Centripetal transport of LEs/lysosomes depends on Rab7 and its effector RILP [23], which interacts with the dynactin subunit p150 Glued [24] and the dynein light intermediate chain [25] (Figs. 1 and 2).…”
The endolysosomal system is extremely dynamic, yet highly organized. The spatiotemporal distribution of endolysosomal organelles depends on transport driven by microtubule motors such as kinesins and dynein, and by actin-based myosin motors. It has recently become appreciated that interactions with motors are controlled by contacts with other organelles, particularly the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The ER also controls the concentration of endolysosomal organelles in the perinuclear area, as well as their fission and fusion, through a complex system of tethering proteins. Dynamic interactions go both ways, as contacts with endosomes can influence the movement of the ER and peroxisomes. The dynamics of endolysosomal organelles should thus no longer be studied in isolation, but in the context of the whole endomembrane system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
