2017
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4822/2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rare cause of intestinal bleeding: duodenal metastasis from endometrial cancer

Abstract: With this report we alert to an extremely rare case of duodenal metastases, from an endometrial adenocarcinoma by lymphatic spread and whose primary manifestation was with gastrointestinal bleeding. We think this is the first case reported of duodenal metastases from endometrial carcinoma and with this presentation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small intestine metastases from EC may clinically present with abdominal cramps, melena, secondary anemia, and epigastric pain [ 3 , 6 , 7 ]. In this case, the patient presented with an enterocutaneous fistula and surrounding skin inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small intestine metastases from EC may clinically present with abdominal cramps, melena, secondary anemia, and epigastric pain [ 3 , 6 , 7 ]. In this case, the patient presented with an enterocutaneous fistula and surrounding skin inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional immunohistochemistry staining differentiates intestinal metastases from other primary adenocarcinomas, especially colorectal cancer. EC shows positivity to CK 7, PAX8, Estrogen Receptor, and Progesterone Receptor [ 7 , 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duodenal malignant was extremely rare and duodenal adenocarcinoma was a primary tumor for malignant disease. Duodenal metastasis could result from other organs, including the breast, lung, kidney, prostate, liver, colon, and uterus [ 18 20 ]. The thickness of the duodenal wall in the current study was quite large and biopsies from conventional endoscopy were negative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%