2020
DOI: 10.25259/sni_437_2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rare case of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula mimicking malignant glioma of the medulla oblongata: Significance of cerebral angiography for accurate diagnosis of brain stem region

Abstract: Background: The findings of a hyperintense sign on T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI) and gadolinium (Gd) contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain stem suggest malignant glioma. However, this pathological condition is probably uncommon, and it may be unknown that a dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) can imitate this radiological pattern. In addition, it is extremely rare to be caused by a spinal DAVF. Here, a rare case of spinal DAVF that mimicked malignant glioma of the medulla oblongat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10] Due to its rarity, there have been reports in the literature that DAVF is mistaken for other diseases, such as temporal arteritis, 3) cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, 4) and malignant glioma of the medulla oblongata. [11][12][13] In this case, the findings were not well defined due to the fact that the shunt was faint. We considered a brain tumor as a differential diagnosis and therefore performed a methionine-PET scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…[8][9][10] Due to its rarity, there have been reports in the literature that DAVF is mistaken for other diseases, such as temporal arteritis, 3) cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, 4) and malignant glioma of the medulla oblongata. [11][12][13] In this case, the findings were not well defined due to the fact that the shunt was faint. We considered a brain tumor as a differential diagnosis and therefore performed a methionine-PET scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%