2016
DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.35298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rare Case of Invasive Apocrine Carcinoma of the Breast with Unusual Radiologic Findings

Abstract: Invasive apocrine carcinoma (IAC) of the breast is a rare subtype of breast malignancy. Its incidence is not well known, but it is approximately less than 1% to 4%. For these reasons, there are few reports and little information on the radiologic appearance of IAC. Furthermore, most of the case reports show malignant features which are similar to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We present a rare case of IAC without typical malignant feature on mammography, and ultrasonography (USG). Imaging findings on comput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows a summary of the published articles reporting the imaging findings of patients with malignant apocrine lesions, and these findings are in line with our results [ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ]; therefore, the radiologic features of carcinoma with apocrine differentiation or ADCIS did not differ from those of typical invasive carcinoma of non-special-type or DCIS. However, invasive carcinoma presented more obvious mass formation on imaging compared with in situ lesions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 2 shows a summary of the published articles reporting the imaging findings of patients with malignant apocrine lesions, and these findings are in line with our results [ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ]; therefore, the radiologic features of carcinoma with apocrine differentiation or ADCIS did not differ from those of typical invasive carcinoma of non-special-type or DCIS. However, invasive carcinoma presented more obvious mass formation on imaging compared with in situ lesions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%