1990
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rapidly Converging Algorithm for Exact Binomial Confidence Intervals About the Relative Risk in Follow-up Studies with Stratified Incidence-Density Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When there were Ͻ11 cases, relative risk and the 95% CI were based on the ratio of event rates. 24 Blocks instead of studies were used as strata for the estimated relative risks because many studies had few or no events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there were Ͻ11 cases, relative risk and the 95% CI were based on the ratio of event rates. 24 Blocks instead of studies were used as strata for the estimated relative risks because many studies had few or no events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,28 statistical analysis A data-analysis plan was completed before the data were unblinded for analysis. 31,[34][35][36][37][38] The analysis was performed by the VACSP coordinating center (West Haven, Conn.), with review and approval by the executive committee of the study. Vaccine efficacy with respect to the burden of illness due to herpes zoster (VE BOI ) was defined as the relative reduction in the burden-of-illness score in the vaccine group as compared with that in the placebo group and calculated as 1¡relative risk (i.e., 1¡the herpeszoster burden-of-illness score in the vaccine group divided by the herpes-zoster burden-of-illness score in the placebo group).…”
Section: Efficacy End Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between AUI and cervical removal was similarly investigated. The data were then stratified according to whether or not the cervix was removed at spaying, and a stratified analysis for person-time data, with exact confidence intervals (Guess and Thomas 1990), was conducted to adjust for any potential confounding effect that this factor might have on the relationship between AUI and time of neutering. The validity of pooling the strata to produce a summary relative risk was assessed with a likelihood-ratio test (Rothman 1986), interpreted at the 5 per cent level of statistical significance.…”
Section: Data Storage and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%