2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21155380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rapid, Simple, Inexpensive, and Mobile Colorimetric Assay COVID-19-LAMP for Mass On-Site Screening of COVID-19

Abstract: To control the COVID-19 pandemic and prevent its resurgence in areas preparing for a return of economic activities, a method for a rapid, simple, and inexpensive point-of-care diagnosis and mass screening is urgently needed. We developed and evaluated a one-step colorimetric reverse-transcriptional loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay (COVID-19-LAMP) for detection of SARS-CoV-2, using SARS-CoV-2 isolate and respiratory samples from patients with COVID-19 (n = 223) and other respiratory virus infections… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
7
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we confirm that one of the fastest, simplest, cheapest and most scalable protocols available for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid is so far reliable for strong positives only, but highly specific compared to RT-PCR detection. Other studies have shown similar reduced sensitivity but high specificity [ 23 , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] ]. One early study found that RT-LAMP was more sensitive than RT-PCR at detecting virus in an asymptomatic carrier monitored for several days [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In this study, we confirm that one of the fastest, simplest, cheapest and most scalable protocols available for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid is so far reliable for strong positives only, but highly specific compared to RT-PCR detection. Other studies have shown similar reduced sensitivity but high specificity [ 23 , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] ]. One early study found that RT-LAMP was more sensitive than RT-PCR at detecting virus in an asymptomatic carrier monitored for several days [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The equipment costs for performing the HP-LAMP assay are very low; performing the assay requires only a pipette, a mini centrifuge, a vortexer, and two heat blocks that retail for ~ 250 USD each. In contrast, the equipment costs for RT-PCR based methods is > 45,000 USD while the automated Roche cobas 6800 unit costs ~ 350,000 USD 27 , 28 . If purchasing the consumable reagents individually using off-the-shelf components, the costs for the HP-LAMP assay is ~ 80 USD per assay, and ~ 16 USD per assay when pooling five samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost for pre-made HP-LAMP cocktails is 20–25 USD per assay (Sorrento Therapeutics). The consumable cost for RT-PCR based methods is 20–60 USD per assay 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Easy readable results [36] N/A PCR fluorometer Pseudovirus samples ORF1b gene, N gene RT-PCR ~ 30 min 10 copies of pseudovirus Magnetic NP-based RNA extraction [55] N/A N/A Nasopharyngeal swab N gene RT-LAMP < 35 min 1.0 × 10 1 copies/μL Simple turbidity results [57] N/A N/A N/A Synthesized ORF1ab gene RT-LAMP > 20 min 10 copies/µL Isothermal amplification, simple colorimetric readout [60] N/A N/A N/A Synthetic ORF1ab gene Penn-LAMP < 1 h 7 copies/reaction Isothermal reaction, high sensitivity, [65] N/A Portable test strip N/A ORF1ab and S gene SHERLOCK < 1 h 10 copies/µL. POC paper stick, easy colorimetric readout [81] N/A Mobile unit Throat swab, sputum, and nasopharyngeal samples ORF3a and E gene RT-LAMP < 2 h N/A Van-sized unit; suitable for quarantine camp [82] N/A Customized instrument Nasopharyngeal swabs RdRp gene RT-LAMP ~ 30 min 10 2 copies/reaction Eye-observable and artificial intelligence-assisted color readout; gel electrophoresis double-check [83] N/A PCR fluorometer Clinical sample RdRp gene RT-PCR < 30 min 11.2 copies/reaction High sensitivity and specificity …”
Section: Biomarkers For Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%