A rapid preparation procedure for laser microdissection-mediated harvest of plant tissues for gene expression analysis

Abstract

Background Gene expression changes that govern essential biological processes can occur at the cell-specific level. To gain insight into such events, laser microdissection is applied to cut out specific cells or tissues from which RNA for gene expression analysis is isolated. However, the preparation of plant tissue sections for laser microdissection and subsequent RNA isolation usually involves fixation and embedding, processes that are often time-consuming and can lower the yield and quality of isolated RNA. Results Infection sites of the parasitic plant Cuscuta reflexa growing on its compatible host plant Pelargonium zonale were sectioned using a vibratome and dried on glass slides at 4 °C before laser microdissection. High quality RNA (RQI > 7) was isolated from 1 mm 2 , 3 mm 2 and 6 mm 2 total surface areas of laser microdissection-harvested C. reflexa tissue, with the yield of RNA correlating to the amount of collected material (on average 7 ng total RNA/mm 2 ). The expression levels of two parasite genes previously found to be highly expressed during host plant infection were shown to differ individually between specific regions of the infection site. By drying plant sections under low pressure to reduce the dehydration time, the induced expression of two wound-related genes during preparation was avoided. Conclusions Plants can be prepared quickly and easily for laser microdissection by direct sectioning of fresh tissue followed by dehydration on glass slides. We show that RNA isolated from material treated in this manner maintains high quality and enables the investigation of differential gene expression at a high morphological resolution. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-019-0471-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The cellulose--lignin balance affects the twisted growth of Yunnan pine trunk

“…Fresh straight and twisty stems of Yunnan pines were snap-frozen in the OCT embedding medium, stored at -20 °C, and sectioned into 15-μm sections by using a freezing microtome (Leica CM1950). The slides with the sections were dried in a desiccator at 4°C for at least 2 h or dried on a 4°C cold metal block in a vacuum chamber (-0.9 bar) for 15 min (Olsen & Krause, 2019). The cryosections were placed on stainless steel slides with PET membranes (Lecia Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), and xylem and phloem cells were collected into the caps of nuclease-free 0.2 mL PCR tubes (Axygen, USA) containing the appropriate buffer for RNA and protein extractions using LCM (LMD7000, Lecia, German).…”

The biology of time: dynamic responses of cell types to developmental, circadian and environmental cues

“…Spatial sequencing that can illustrate in situ differences in gene expression will likely prove an important technique in validating single‐cell sequencing approaches (Alon et al., 2021; Cho et al., 2021; Takei et al., 2021). Protoplasting (Ortiz‐Ramirez et al., 2018), LCM (Olsen and Krause, 2019) and nuclei isolation techniques (Thibivilliers et al., 2020) are constantly improving to ensure dynamic changes in plant gene regulation can be captured faithfully at the single‐cell level. Dovetailing with these techniques is the growth in novel algorithms for analyzing single‐cell transcriptomic data (Sagar and Grun, 2020), as well as community efforts that aim to benchmark gene regulatory markers of plant cell identity (Ma et al., 2020b; Plant Cell Atlas et al., 2021; Rhee et al., 2019).…”