2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid method to assess salt marsh condition and guide management decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An 8.9-ha subsection of the overall study site exhibits signs of SLR and inundation stress including large areas of marsh platform die-off, in both low and high marsh. Die-off areas are distinct from natural pools and pannes in that they are shallow impounded surface depressions containing combinations of bare peat, open water, stunted vegetation, and filamentous algae ( Kutcher et al, 2022 ). In other areas, stunted S. alterniflora intermixes with high marsh grasses, providing evidence of ongoing SLR effects on the marsh.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An 8.9-ha subsection of the overall study site exhibits signs of SLR and inundation stress including large areas of marsh platform die-off, in both low and high marsh. Die-off areas are distinct from natural pools and pannes in that they are shallow impounded surface depressions containing combinations of bare peat, open water, stunted vegetation, and filamentous algae ( Kutcher et al, 2022 ). In other areas, stunted S. alterniflora intermixes with high marsh grasses, providing evidence of ongoing SLR effects on the marsh.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The marsh is unditched with a small number of remnant pools on the marsh platform. The control marsh is also exhibiting SLR stress including stunted vegetation, waterlogged soils and expanding marsh surface die-off areas ( Kutcher et al, 2022 ). Surface salinity can exceed 35 ppt, likely due to tidal water evaporation in shallow die-off areas ( Mikula et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Area to edge ratio + more core and less edge represents less exposure to erosion through wave action [46,55] Unvegetated edge ratio -more unvegetated edge represents more risk to tidal currents and RSLR [31,47,56] Land Cover/Use in watershed % impervious -more impervious can negatively impact runoff/habitat [48,49] % natural + more natural areas can absorb runoff/protect habitat [52][53][54] % agricultural -more agriculture can negatively impact runoff/habitat [50,51] Vulnerability Erosion Soil erodibility -high erosion potential represents greater risk of loss of sediment from marsh [45,57] Tides Tidal range + a larger tidal range represents more resilience to RSLR, since plant elevational distribution is broader [30,32,37,58,59] % marsh below MHHW -more marsh below MHHW represents more risk of converting high marsh to low marsh with RSLR [24,60] % marsh below MTL -more marsh below MTL represents more area at risk of excessive inundation in the face of RSLR [45,56,61] Adaptive Capacity Shoreline Hardened shoreline -more hardened shoreline represents more impediments to migration and decreased sediment supply [4,62,63] Shoreline complexity + the more complex the shoreline the more opportunity for diverse habitats to support greater biodiversity [38,64,65] Migration Ability Marsh migration space + more migration space in low-lying uplands adjacent to marsh represents a larger potential future area for marsh to move into [9,35,36,66] Wetland "connectedness" + marshes that are more connected to each other in the future are able to support species migrations…”
Section: Marsh Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEM, WARMER, SLAMM) that are not always accessible for managers to employ on a local scale due to complexity or absence of required data inputs [32][33][34][35]. Conversely, many other studies are focused on a local or regional scale with metrics that are not applicable across geographic areas [36][37][38]. Many evaluation tools focus on marsh assessment and fail to provide recommended approaches to managers [15,37,[39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%