2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.23.166397
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid, highly sensitive and open-access SARS-CoV-2 detection assay for laboratory and home testing

Abstract: Global efforts to monitor and contain the Covid-19 pandemic, caused by the beta-coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, currently rely on RT-qPCR-based diagnostic assays. Yet their high cost, moderate throughput, and dependence on sophisticated equipment limit a broad implementation. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is an alternative detection method that has the potential to overcome these limitations. Here, we established a robust, highly sensitive and versatile RT-LAMP-based SARS-CoV-2 detection assay that … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
109
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
109
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, one thing to be kept in mind when directly comparing sensitivity between the different methods, is the fact that qPCR reaches this standard only in isolated RNA whilst the multiplex RT-LAMP assay attains an optimized detection rate already in primary material. Of note, further addition of a step concentrating RNA using bead-based pulldown to an RT-LAMP-based protocol has also been successful [ 26 ]. Remarkably, here the authors move from swabs, that require trained personnel and personal protection equipment, to a home-based gargle [ 26 ] and a very recent report using qPCR demonstrated, that even saliva could be used as a valid source for viral diagnostics [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, one thing to be kept in mind when directly comparing sensitivity between the different methods, is the fact that qPCR reaches this standard only in isolated RNA whilst the multiplex RT-LAMP assay attains an optimized detection rate already in primary material. Of note, further addition of a step concentrating RNA using bead-based pulldown to an RT-LAMP-based protocol has also been successful [ 26 ]. Remarkably, here the authors move from swabs, that require trained personnel and personal protection equipment, to a home-based gargle [ 26 ] and a very recent report using qPCR demonstrated, that even saliva could be used as a valid source for viral diagnostics [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cost can be potentially reduced by reducing the volume to the 25 µl to achieve ~$2 per reaction, albeit with reduced sensitivity. Additionally, use of open source enzymes 26,33 and pooling the samples could further reduce costs. As the volume of LAMP reaction increases, false positive results seem to increase in frequency which manifested as a few negative samples turning orange in our experiments presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it does not require a PCR machine, RT-LAMP is ideal for field testing of viral infections and has been used for Ebola diagnosis and surveillance in Guinea 9,10 , for tracking Zika virus in Brazilian mosquito populations 11 , and for COVID-19 diagnosis during the initial outbreak in Wuhan and Shenyang, China 12,13 . Recent work has solidified RT-LAMP as a simple, inexpensive, and sufficiently sensitive alternative to RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, much effort has been devoted to developing more streamlined sample prep protocols that match the simplicity of LAMP. Silica-coated magnetic beads [47,48], pH-sensitive magnetic beads [49,50], poly carboxyl-functionalized magnetic beads [51,52], gravity-driven gel filtration [53], and lateral-flow filtration [54] are seemingly more appropriate for field-deployable extraction than spin columns, vacuum manifolds, or robotic systems often employed in laboratory settings. However, these processes still require multiple steps and skilled operators.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%