1988
DOI: 10.1190/1.1442551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid graphical method for the interpretation of the self‐potential anomaly over a two‐dimensional inclined sheet of finite depth extent

Abstract: The inclined sheet is an important model for interpreting self‐potential (SP) anomalies over elongated ore deposits. Many techniques (Roy and Chowdhurry, 1959; Meiser, 1962; Paul, 1965; Atchuta Rao et al., 1982; Atchuta Rao and Ram Babu, 1983; Murty and Haricharan, 1985) have been proposed for interpreting SP anomalies over this model. We propose a simple graphical procedure for locating the upper and lower edges of an inclined sheet of infinite strike extent from its SP anomaly V(x) using a few characteristic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods include, for example, those defined by YUNGUL (1950), BANERJEE (1971), FITTERMAN (1979), BHATTACHARYA and ROY (1981), ATCHUTA RAO and RAM BABU (1983), RAM BABU and ATCHUTA RAO (1988), ABDELRAHMAN and SHARAFELDIN (1997), and ABDELRAHMAN et al (1997aABDELRAHMAN et al ( ,b, 1998. However, the accuracy of the result obtained by most of these methods depends upon the accuracy to which the residual anomaly can be separated from the observed SP data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods include, for example, those defined by YUNGUL (1950), BANERJEE (1971), FITTERMAN (1979), BHATTACHARYA and ROY (1981), ATCHUTA RAO and RAM BABU (1983), RAM BABU and ATCHUTA RAO (1988), ABDELRAHMAN and SHARAFELDIN (1997), and ABDELRAHMAN et al (1997aABDELRAHMAN et al ( ,b, 1998. However, the accuracy of the result obtained by most of these methods depends upon the accuracy to which the residual anomaly can be separated from the observed SP data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods include, for examples, use of characteristic points, distances, curves and nomograms (YUNGUL, 1950;BANERJEE, 1971;FITTERMAN, 1979;BHATTACHARYA and ROY, 1981;ATCHUTA RAO and RAM BABU, 1983;RAM BABU and ATCHUTA RAO, 1988), least-squares techniques (ABDELRAHMAN and SHARAFELDIN, 1997;EL-ARABY, 2004, and ABDELRAHMAN et al, 1997a, 2003, 2004, 2006a-b and 2008, Fourier analysis and wave number domain (ATCHUTA RAO et al, 1982;ROY and MOHAN, 1984), window-curves methods (ABDELRAHMAN et al, 1997b(ABDELRAHMAN et al, , 1998(ABDELRAHMAN et al, , 2003(ABDELRAHMAN et al, , and 2009). On the other hand, the drawback with most of the previous graphical and numerical methods is that they cannot determine the four model parameters from all data points of the SP anomaly profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been proposed and discussed by many authors for interpreting the self-potential anomalies as a result of a two-dimensional inclined sheet, including, for example, logarithmic curve matching (Meiser 1962;Murty and Haricharan 1984), characteristic distances, points and curves approaches (Rao et al 1970;Paul 1965;Atchuta Rao and Ram Babu 1983), and nomograms (Ram Babu and Atchuta Rao 1988;Satyanarayana Murty and Haricharan 1985) Recently, Abdelrahman et al (1998Abdelrahman et al ( , 1999Abdelrahman et al ( , 2001) introduced the horizontal self-potential gradient and least squares approaches to interpret the self-potential anomaly due to a two-dimensional inclined sheet. The advantage of the proposed method over the previous techniques, which uses a few points, distances, and nomograms, is that all observed data can be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%