2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid fluorescent aptasensor for point-of-care detection of C-reactive protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the traditional sandwich method, this SA–Bio sandwich FLISA method further improves the sensitivity (∼4.25 fold) and expands the detection range, which indicates the introduction of the SA-Bio system to realize the signal amplification of sandwich FLISA. However, the LOD in this SA–Bio FLISA for CRP detection is not comparable to that of the Cd-based QD and novel Au-based FLISA. For low-toxicity In-based QD labels, , this SA–Bio FLISA reveals the lowest LOD (Table S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Compared to the traditional sandwich method, this SA–Bio sandwich FLISA method further improves the sensitivity (∼4.25 fold) and expands the detection range, which indicates the introduction of the SA-Bio system to realize the signal amplification of sandwich FLISA. However, the LOD in this SA–Bio FLISA for CRP detection is not comparable to that of the Cd-based QD and novel Au-based FLISA. For low-toxicity In-based QD labels, , this SA–Bio FLISA reveals the lowest LOD (Table S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Chen et al. argue that any detection time under 40 minutes qualifies as rapid detection, [39] and there are numerous fluorescence sensors with detection times of not less than 40 min were reported. For instance, Vaishanav et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, though the reaction time of 40 min was longer in this work, it is considered acceptable. Chen et al argue that any detection time under 40 minutes qualifies as rapid detection, [39] and there are numerous fluorescence sensors with detection times of not less than 40 min were reported. For instance, Vaishanav et al utilized Mn 2 + -doped CdTe/ZnS QDs to develop a folic acid sensor with a reaction time of 40 min; [40] Peng et al reported an aptamer-based fluorescent biosensor for ATP detection based on the CRISPR-Cas12a system, and the reaction time was also 40 min; [41] A fluorescent progesterone biosensor was successfully established with a reaction time of 2.5 hours; [42] A ratiometric fluorescent sensor with dual target recognition sites was designed for the sensitive detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei DNA, and the detection time was 40 min; [43] Li et al developed a method for the rapid detection of ochratoxin A based on aptamer-regulated DNA-silver nanoclusters with a reaction time of 45 min; [44] Zhang et al reported A ratiometric fluorescence sensor for determination of choline based on gold nanoclusters and enzymatic reaction with the reaction time of 50 min, [45] and so on.…”
Section: Establishment Of Fa Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used techniques for CRP detection in clinical laboratories include enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) [ 6 , 7 , 8 ], immunoturbidimetric assays [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], latex immunoagglutination assays [ 12 , 13 ], fluorescence assays [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], chemiluminescence assays [ 17 , 18 ], surface plasmon resonance-based assays [ 19 ], and electrochemical assays [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. However, these methods are time-consuming and require skilled operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%