2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2004.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid flow cytometric method for determining the cellular composition of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cells in mouse models of asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
133
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our use of AF to distinguish macrophages (AF ϩ ) from lung DCs (AF Ϫ ) represents a critical step in our identification process because both cell types express CD11c. This distinction, well described in two prior studies 41,45 and in other infectious and noninfectious models of pulmonary inflammation, 42,[51][52][53]68 permits more specific identification and enumeration of macrophage and DC populations in the lungs of mice. In our model, AF ϩ macrophages, purified by cell sorting, are large cells (with high forward and side scatter) displaying numerous intracytoplasmic vacuoles, some containing cryptococci, consistent with macrophage morphological features (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our use of AF to distinguish macrophages (AF ϩ ) from lung DCs (AF Ϫ ) represents a critical step in our identification process because both cell types express CD11c. This distinction, well described in two prior studies 41,45 and in other infectious and noninfectious models of pulmonary inflammation, 42,[51][52][53]68 permits more specific identification and enumeration of macrophage and DC populations in the lungs of mice. In our model, AF ϩ macrophages, purified by cell sorting, are large cells (with high forward and side scatter) displaying numerous intracytoplasmic vacuoles, some containing cryptococci, consistent with macrophage morphological features (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Next, we set consecutive gates which identified CD11c ϩ cells ( Figure 1A, left dot plot) and distinguished autofluorescent (AF ϩ ) macrophages from non-AF (AF Ϫ ) dendritic cells (DCs) ( Figure 1A, middle dot plot), as previously described. 41,45,[51][52][53] Last, we used relative expression of CD11b to distinguish CD11b-negative AMs (CD11c ϩ AF ϩ CD11b Ϫ ) 42,54,55 and CD11b-positive ExMs (CD11c ϩ AF ϩ CD11b ϩ ) 33,35 ( Figure 1A, right dot plot; gates labeled AM and ExM). Proper gate placement for AF and expression of CD11c and CD11b were determined using AMs obtained from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of uninfected mice (which consists of Ͼ90% CD11c ϩ AF ϩ CD11b Ϫ AMs; data not shown).…”
Section: Cd11c ϩ Cd11b ϩ Autofluorescent Exms Are the Most Prevalent mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression of protein levels of iNOS, IL-12b, Arg-1, Fizz1, MGL-1/2, and IL-10 was determined by flow cytometry cell surface and intracellular staining, as previously described (41,42). Cells isolated from BALF were incubated with Golgi inhibitor (monensin; BD Biosciences), and cell surface staining was carried out by incubation with PerCP-Cy5.5 antimouse CD11c (BioLegend), fixation and permeabilization (BD Fixation and Permeabilization Solution Kit; BD Biosciences), and staining with allophycocyanin-conjugated mAb against murine IL-10, FITC-conjugated mAb against murine iNOS, or PE-conjugated mAb against murine IL-12b (all from BD Biosciences).…”
Section: Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential cells counts were analysed by flow cytometry as previously described [42]. For the determination of DC activation in lung or LNs, cell suspensions were stained for 20 min with APClabelled anti-CD80, PE-labelled anti-OX40L, PE-labelled anti-CD40, APC-labelled anti-CD80, APC-labelled anti-CCR7, FITC-labelled anti-MHC class II antibodies.…”
Section: Flow Cytometry Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%