1992
DOI: 10.1093/nar/20.19.5061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid chemiluminescent method for quanititation of human DNA

Abstract: A sensitive and simple method for the quantitation of human DNA is described. This method is based on probe hybridization to a human alpha satellite locus, D17Z1. The biotinylated probe is hybridized to sample DNA immobilized on nylon membrane. The subsequent binding of streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase to the bound probe allows for chemiluminescent detection using a luminol-based reagent and X-ray film. Less than 150 pg of human DNA can easily be detected with a 15 minute exposure. The entire procedure can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DNA was extracted from semen using the Chelex extraction method [21] and quantification was carried out as described by Walsh et al [22]. DNA dilutions were prepared from the stock DNA using sterile distilled water (SDW).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA was extracted from semen using the Chelex extraction method [21] and quantification was carried out as described by Walsh et al [22]. DNA dilutions were prepared from the stock DNA using sterile distilled water (SDW).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proElectrophoresis 1999, 20, 2870±2876 DNA typing of fingerprints 2871 cedure is based on the hybridization of a biotinylated oligonucleotide probe to DNA samples immobilized on a nylon membrane [15]. The probe used is complementary to a specific alpha satellite DNA sequence at the locus D17Z1 [16].…”
Section: Dna Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantity of human DNA is estimated by judging the intensity of the standards compared with that of the specimens. This evaluation is subjective, and there may be variation among analysts or laboratories (3,4). The analysis can also be done using a CCDBIO (MiraiBio) imaging system.…”
Section: Part I Comparison Of Dna Quantitation Techniques For Forensmentioning
confidence: 99%