1993
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90001-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid and sensitive PCR strategy employed for amplification and sequencing of porA from a single colony-forming unit of Neisseria meningitidis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The porA gene was sequenced and the corresponding sequence perfectly matched the one previously described. 45 The open reading frame was 1155 bp, close to the size of the wild-type sequence. These features promoted the PorA expression as inclusion bodies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The porA gene was sequenced and the corresponding sequence perfectly matched the one previously described. 45 The open reading frame was 1155 bp, close to the size of the wild-type sequence. These features promoted the PorA expression as inclusion bodies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The porA gene was amplified by PCR using DNA from N. meningitidis B:15:P1.3 as the template 45 and Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene). The strain has been annotated as B15: P1.7b,3, following the PorA VR type designation, 46 and the original PorA gene sequence has been deposited 45 at the GenBank as acc # L02929.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, the characterization of meningococci has relied on serogrouping, serotyping and serosubtyping using serological methods, thereby limiting the designation of serotypes and serosubtypes because a panel of mAbs is used. Newer nucleotide sequence methods, based on the detection and sequencing of the porB and porA genes for serotype (class 2/3 OMP) and serosubtype (class 1 OMP), respectively, have led to a better understanding of the variability of these proteins (Urwin et al, 1998a, b, c;Clarke et al, 2001a;Jelfs et al, 2000;Molling et al, 2000;Feavers et al, 1996;Saunders et al, 1993;Smith et al, 1995). However, most of these methods are only useful when N. meningitidis has been isolated from blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and they therefore rely on the availability of a culture (Jelfs et al, 2000;Feavers et al, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%