2009
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-99-12-1365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rapid and Precise Diagnostic Method for Detecting the Pinewood Nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Abstract: Bursaphelenchus xylophilus is the causal agent of pine wilt disease, which is a major forest disease in Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, and Portugal. A diagnostic method which is rapid, precise, and simple could greatly help the proper management of this disease. Here, we present a novel detection method using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) targeting the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA of the nematode. Specificity of the primers and LAMP was confirmed using DNA from various nema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
110
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
110
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it can also be compared to numerous other species-specific molecular detection or identification methods that identify species such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Kiewnick et al 2013), real-time PCR (qPCR) (Huang et al 2010), and isothermal amplification techniques such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (Kikuchi et al 2009). However, the latter methods are typically targeted to a single species (or occasionally a small group of species), and therefore they are used in the context of answering the question "is this specimen species x?".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it can also be compared to numerous other species-specific molecular detection or identification methods that identify species such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Kiewnick et al 2013), real-time PCR (qPCR) (Huang et al 2010), and isothermal amplification techniques such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (Kikuchi et al 2009). However, the latter methods are typically targeted to a single species (or occasionally a small group of species), and therefore they are used in the context of answering the question "is this specimen species x?".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One previously described method, an adaptation of the cetylmethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, was efficient, but laborious and time consuming (Takeuchi et al 2005;Futai 2007, 2009). Another method described by Kikuchi et al (2009) and Kanetani et al (2011), cannot be reproduced as there is no description of the buffers and the mentioned kit is not commercially available. The DNA extraction methods, directly from wood samples, described by Wang et al (2010) and Hu et al (2011) are time consuming and use only 5 mg of wood sample as starter material, which is a much smaller sample than the 100 mg used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular detection methods are simpler, faster and reliable and thus several PCR based methods to detect B. xylophilus with species-specific primers have been developed by targeting either rDNA, ITS regions, satDNA or Hsp70 and DNA topoisomerase I genes (Iwahori et al 1998(Iwahori et al , 2000Kang et al 2004;Matsunaga and Togashi 2004;Cao et al 2005;Castagnone et al 2005;Leal et al 2005Leal et al , 2007Kang et al 2009;Huang et al 2010;Zhuo et al 2011). However, few studies on the use of these methodologies for direct detection of PWN in pine wood and insect vector, without the preliminary steps of nematode extraction, have been conducted (François et al 2007;Takeuchi and Futai 2007;Kikuchi et al 2009;Takeuchi and Futai 2009;Kanetani et al 2011;Wang et al 2010;Hu et al 2011;Wang et al 2011). In the present study, a new methodology was developed for the direct detection of PWN, performed by PCR amplification of the species specific MspI satDNA, leading to a pattern of monomer and multimers of the 160 bp monomer (Tarés et al 1994;Castagnone et al 2005), as recommended by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) (2009), using total DNA extracted from P. pinaster wood and bark samples and from the insect vector, M. galloprovincialis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early on-site detection of plant pathogens with portable biosensors will enable the design of strategies to control the spread of diseases and will also help the study of disease epidemiology. 156 The agricultural sector today requires biosensors for detection of multiple potential pathogens or newly emerged pathogens 157 without necessarily knowing the plant diseases affecting that particular crop group. The development of portable and rapid plant pathogen biosensors would be of value to users from various backgrounds, including individual growers, regulatory agencies, exporters, and researchers.…”
Section: Plant Pathogen Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%