2017
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.026765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid and effective method for screening, sequencing and reporter verification of engineered frameshift mutations in zebrafish

Abstract: Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas-based adaptive immunity against pathogens in bacteria has been adapted for genome editing and applied in zebrafish (Danio rerio) to generate frameshift mutations in protein-coding genes. Although there are methods to detect, quantify and sequence CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations, identifying mutations in F1 heterozygous fish remains challenging. Additionally, sequencing a mutation and assuming that it causes a frameshift does not prove causality bec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of exonic-part 6 retention in Δ6abc/5 -mutated salmon using RNA-seq data revealed mis-splicing of the Δ6fads2-a transcript resulting in the skipping of exonic part 6 (Figure 2). Exon skipping caused by CRISPR/Cas9-generated mutations was observed previously in both cell lines [31, 32] and genetically modified organisms including zebrafish [33] and salmon [17]. CRISPR induced mis-splicing is mostly caused by one of two mechanisms: i) indels generated by CRISPR-mutation affects the exon-intron boundaries or ii) indels promote exon skipping by disrupting an exon splicing enhancer or introducing an exon splicing silencer within the targeted exon [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Analysis of exonic-part 6 retention in Δ6abc/5 -mutated salmon using RNA-seq data revealed mis-splicing of the Δ6fads2-a transcript resulting in the skipping of exonic part 6 (Figure 2). Exon skipping caused by CRISPR/Cas9-generated mutations was observed previously in both cell lines [31, 32] and genetically modified organisms including zebrafish [33] and salmon [17]. CRISPR induced mis-splicing is mostly caused by one of two mechanisms: i) indels generated by CRISPR-mutation affects the exon-intron boundaries or ii) indels promote exon skipping by disrupting an exon splicing enhancer or introducing an exon splicing silencer within the targeted exon [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…CRISPR/Cas9 and its variations provide an efficient and convenient tool for targeted genome editing in mammalian cells, rodent embryo, zebrafish, drosophila, plants and bacteria [1,4,7,8,13,14]. These DNA editing strategies have been widely used for gene knock-out and knock-in, mutation, targeted correction and even chromosome elimination and inversion [15][16][17][18][19], highlighting promising therapeutic applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repair of the DNA damage often introduces small deletions or insertions that disrupt the target gene and thereby knock out its function. CRISPR/Cas9 has been widely used to generate cell and animal lines with specific gene function being disrupted or knockout [4][5][6][7][8]. Applying the genome surgery to study gene function and to correct disease-associated genetic mutations highlights therapeutic applications in curing genetic disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While effective and efficient, morpholinos can be prone to off-target effects worthy of validation in permanent loss-of-function mutants (Bedell et al, 2011). CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was employed to target hace1, but the first attempt resulted in no phenotype due to an alternative translation start site (Prykhozhij et al, 2017). The second attempt resulted in identification of an allele with the nonsense-mediated decay activity of 95 %, but the breeding of the F1 mutation carriers often led to large numbers of embryos with abnormalities unlinked to the hace1 mutation, possibly due to off-target mutations or inbreeding (data not shown).…”
Section: Developmental Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%