A Ranking of Journals in Economics and Related Fields

Ritzberger, Klaus

doi:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00446.x

Cited by 51 publications

(76 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A third classification that is closely related to Ritzberger and CL03 is the VfS scheme of the German Economic Association (cf. Schneider and Ursprung 2008). Just as the CL03 weighting scheme, the VfS scheme classifies all journals indexed in EconLit.…”

Section: Economicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…But for the overall sample it is still almost equal to one. Recall that Schneider and Ursprung (2008) who compiled the VfS scheme chose to classify journals not indexed in ISI with the help of citation data from SCOPUS, whereas Combes and Linnemer (2010) used indicators such as the authors' standing and Google Scholar citations. Whatever the relative merits of the two approaches may be, the two methods generate almost the same results.…”

Section: Department Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Research evaluation and journal quality weights

Krapf

2010

Z Betriebswirtsch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research evaluations based on quality weighted publication output are often criticized on account of the employed journal quality weights. This study shows that evaluations of entire research organizations are very robust with respect to the choice of readily available weighting schemes. We document this robustness by applying rather different weighting schemes to otherwise identical rankings. Our unit of analysis consists of German, Austrian and Swiss university departments in business administration and economics.

show abstract

Section: Economicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Department Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research evaluation and journal quality weights

Krapf

2010

Z Betriebswirtsch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, for the 1989 RS E and the 1992 RAE up to two publications from each full-time member of the faculty were RAE and subsequent exercises (Harley and Lee, 1997;Lee and Harley, 1998;and Lee, 2007). It is not difficult to discern why Diamond's list of 27 journals obtained such an elevated status among UK economists: those journals appeared repeatedly as top quality journals in journal ranking studies and in articles that used 'professional judgment' journals to identify the top, blue ribbon, or 'everyone would agree are core, mainstream, highly respected, quality' journals prior to 1989 and since 1989 up to the present day (Lee, 2006;Schneider and Ursprung, 2008;Ritzberger, 2008;Da Silva 2009;Halkos and Nickolaos, 2011;Kalaitzidakis, Mamuneas, and Stengos, 2011); and they appeared to be sanctioned by Economics and Social Research Council, the RES, and CHUDE since they represent ed 16 of the 22 high impact journals identified in their jointly sponsored study, International…”

Section: Journalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The UK Research Assessment Exercise and the narrowing of UK economics

Lee¹,

Pham²,

Gu³

2013

Cambridge Journal of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Federated learning (FL) has enabled distributed learning of a model across multiple clients in a privacy-preserving manner. One of the main challenges of FL is to accommodate clients with varying hardware capacities; clients have differing compute and memory requirements. To tackle this challenge, recent state-of-the-art approaches leverage the use of early exits. Nonetheless, these approaches fall short of mitigating the challenges of joint learning multiple exit classifiers, often relying on hand-picked heuristic solutions for knowledge distillation among classifiers and/or utilizing additional layers for weaker classifiers. In this work, instead of utilizing multiple classifiers, we propose a recurrent early exit approach named ReeFL that fuses features from different sub-models into a single shared classifier. Specifically, we use a transformer-based earlyexit module shared among sub-models to i) better exploit multi-layer feature representations for task-specific prediction and ii) modulate the feature representation of the backbone model for subsequent predictions. We additionally present a per-client self-distillation approach where the best sub-model is automatically selected as the teacher of the other sub-models at each client. Our experiments on standard image and speech classification benchmarks across various emerging federated fine-tuning baselines demonstrate ReeFL's effectiveness over previous works.

show abstract

“…Ritzberger's classification is used by Schneider and Ursprung (2008) (Kiel, 2010). The minimum criteria for a journal to be considered in the Kiel list are that it must be a refereed journal and it must be also listed either in EconLit or in JCR of WoS.…”

Section: Until 2004 Wos Was a Monopoly On November 2004 Elsevier Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Journals that achieve the minimum criteria are classified in category "E". In order to classify journals in categories from "A" to "D" a modified version of Schneider and Ursprung's (2008) ranking is used.…”

Section: Until 2004 Wos Was a Monopoly On November 2004 Elsevier Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring economic journals’ citation efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach

Halkos

Tzeremes

2011

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in AbstractThis paper by using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and statistical inference evaluates the citation performance of 229 economic journals. The paper categorizes the journals into four main categories (A to D) based on their efficiency levels. The results are then compared to the 27 "core economic journals" as introduced by Dimond (1989). The results reveal that after more than twenty years Diamonds' list of "core economic journals" is still valid. Finally, for the first time the paper uses data from four well-known databases (SSCI, Scopus, RePEc, Econlit) and two quality ranking reports (Kiel Institute internals ranking and ABS quality ranking report) in a DEA setting and in order to derive the ranking of 229 economic journals.

show abstract

A Ranking of Journals in Economics and Related Fields

Cited by 51 publications

References 31 publications

Research evaluation and journal quality weights

Research evaluation and journal quality weights

The UK Research Assessment Exercise and the narrowing of UK economics

Measuring economic journals’ citation efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About