2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ranking method based on DEA and PROMETHEE II (a rank based on DEA & PR.II)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the technology has been named in contemporary literature PROMETHEE GAIA. The number of the studies applying PROMETHEE GAIA method in their research is increasing year after year, which is confirmed by numerous publications [64,65,67,68,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the technology has been named in contemporary literature PROMETHEE GAIA. The number of the studies applying PROMETHEE GAIA method in their research is increasing year after year, which is confirmed by numerous publications [64,65,67,68,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…MCDM methods provide mathematical models for ranking alternatives based on the selected criteria, clearly and transparently presenting ranking alternative results and synthesis of final results [64,65]. PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation) is a kind of MCDM method developed by J. P. Brans and its basic point is comparison based on alignement [66][67][68].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their implementation being widespread in MCDA, PROMETHEE methods present some drawbacks in their application to real-world decision problems, due to the limitations imposed by their basic assumptions [37]. As a consequence, to overcome these shortcomings, in the last decade many extensions of PROMETHEE methods have been proposed in literature with respect to, among others, weights determination [38], integration with data envelopment analysis [39,40], analytic network process [41] or fuzzy approaches [42,43], recommendations robustness [44], and sorting methods [45].…”
Section: Methodological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Podinovski and Bouzdine-Chameeva (2016) discussed the negative effects of using very low values for lower bounds of weights and suggested a modified DEA model to overcome these. Bagherikahvarin and Smet (2016) derived the restrictions on weights of DEA from an MCDM method. Using PROMETHEE II, they obtained intervals for the weights.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%