1994
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1994.12.7.1427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized trial of two etoposide schedules in small-cell lung cancer: the influence of pharmacokinetics on efficacy and toxicity.

Abstract: The 5-day and 8-day regimens had equivalent activity in small-cell lung cancer. A pharmacokinetic association between concentrations of etoposide and response and toxicity was found. Antitumor activity was associated with the maintenance of lower levels of etoposide than found to be associated with hematologic toxicity. This supports the hypothesis that the schedule of etoposide administration may affect efficacy and toxicity, and that prolonged exposure to low concentrations of etoposide may improve the thera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This clearance is higher than that reported in seven previous studies in children 1,6,9,12,28 and 14 previous studies in adults. 1,2,7,11,13 One possible explanation for the very high clearance we observed is that the previous 4 week course of prednisone may have induced CYP3A4 43 metabolism of etoposide, 40 a finding consistent with our previous observations of enhanced P450 metabolism following remission induction. 44 In summary, although our data should be interpreted with caution due to their retrospective nature and the small number of patients, they represent the only pharmacokinetic data available in identically treated patients who did and did not go on to develop epipodophyllotoxin-associated AML, and may provide insights into variables that deserve further study.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This clearance is higher than that reported in seven previous studies in children 1,6,9,12,28 and 14 previous studies in adults. 1,2,7,11,13 One possible explanation for the very high clearance we observed is that the previous 4 week course of prednisone may have induced CYP3A4 43 metabolism of etoposide, 40 a finding consistent with our previous observations of enhanced P450 metabolism following remission induction. 44 In summary, although our data should be interpreted with caution due to their retrospective nature and the small number of patients, they represent the only pharmacokinetic data available in identically treated patients who did and did not go on to develop epipodophyllotoxin-associated AML, and may provide insights into variables that deserve further study.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The epipodophyllotoxins, etoposide and teniposide, are a class of antineoplastics for which pharmacodynamic relationships have been established: ie plasma concentration of parent drug correlates with both anticancer effect [1][2][3] and acute toxicity (eg myelosuppression).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High etoposide concentrations (>10 µg/ml) were maintained for considerably longer periods in the less effective one day arm than in the superior five day arm (23 versus 11 h, respectively). In a subsequent study in SCLC [14], a five day schedule was compared to an eight day schedule for administration of 500 mg etoposide. In this second study, patients were of poorer performance status than in the initial study and toxicity from etoposide was greater than that seen in the initial trial.…”
Section: Rationale For Chronic Etoposide Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from a randomised trial by Clark et al (1994), comparing a schedule of 1 -5 days to a schedule of 1 -8 days, support these findings (Nissen et al, 1976;Lau et al, 1979; Oral etoposide and GM-CSF in advanced ovarian cancer M Baur et al Ogawa et al, 1983;Kimura et al, 1985). Furthermore, two other phase I trials that explored schedules extended to 21 days recommended a dosage of 50 -75 mg m À2 day À1 , which cumulatively corresponds to our total dose of 1000 mg m À2 per cycle (Hainsworth et al, 1989;Noda et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%